Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Player Ratings - Chelsea (H)







jonny.rainbow

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2005
6,847
I’m amazed by how many people are rating Propper higher than Stephens.

Propper is our worst offender for ball watching. Watch their second goal. All stemmed from one of Propper’s trademark lapses.
 




Ninja Elephant

Doctor Elephant
Feb 16, 2009
18,855
Ryan 7 No chance with the goals and made the saves you'd expect your goalkeeper to make.
Schelotto 9 Mental how good he was after how ordinary he has seemed before today, incredibly aggresive performance.
Goldson 5 Totally exposed by the formation and stitched up with the movement of Hazard and Willian.
Duffy 4 Dreadful performance in all aspects, dire positionally.
Dunk 6 Uncomfortable with the position and struggled with some of his range of passing.
Suttner 5 A couple of good attacking involvements but dreadfully exposed at times and he shouldn't have been.
Stephens 6 Getting a bit of a hammering, he was outclassed but that's not unreasonable. Pivotal for us in our team.
Propper 7 He shouldn't be kept on the leash, there's really no benefit. Let him roam or drop Gross, start Kayal and push Propper on.
Gross 5 Totally out of his comfort zone today, offered nothing bar a few good passes here and there.
March 4 No idea why he started the game, none. Hopelessly out of place, tactically and technically.
Hemed 5 Tough ask for him today and a poor performance.

Subs
Kayal 6 Showed the fighting spirit we needed from the start, he should have been in the team ahead of Gross.
Murray 5 Not fair to judge really, but he was on long enough to have done SOMETHING!
Izquierdo N/A Should have started instead of Solly March, odd that he wasn't in the team.

Hughton 0 Tactically terrible, didn't make any changes to help the team. Badly outclassed today.
 


neilbard

Hedging up
Oct 8, 2013
6,280
Ryan 7
Goldson 6
Duffy 4
Dunk 6
Schelotto 10 MOM
Propper 7
Gross 7
(Kayal 68min, 6)
Stephens 6
Suttner 6
March 5
(Izquierdo 83min,5)
Hemed 5
(Murray 68min, 5)

Moss -10 :censored:
 




perseus

Broad Blue & White stripe
Jul 5, 2003
23,461
Sūþseaxna
Ryan 8
Schelotto 9 MOM
Suttner 7
Dunk 7
Duffy 6
Goldson 4
Stephens 7
Propper 8
March 7
Gross 7
Hemed 8

Subs - not enough time.
 


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
12,138
Ryan 6 - Not a lot he could do about the goals and a couple of excellent saves to keep us in it up until the last 15 minutes
Schelotto 8.5 - superb performance - should keep Bruno out of the team for the next couple of games
Suttner 6 - Decent enough
Dunk 5 - Some goood - some bad - not up to his usual high level
Duffy 4 - Struggled with the new formation. Got in Goldson's way too often. Would like to see the BFG start for the next game
Goldson 6 - Best of the centre backs.
Stephens 5.5 - Not a bad game, but.... every game he seems to give away a stupid freekick outside the box. Normally when the attacker has got two defenders in front of him.
Propper 7 - Really good today, playing a bit further forward brought out the best in him
March 7 - deserved his starting nod, hope he builds on it ( but suspect rotation will see knocky back instead)
Gross 5 - not so great today.
Hemed 6 - should have scored. But other than that had a decent enough game
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,956
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
Ryan 7

Schelotto 9
Suttner 6
Dunk 6
Duffy 5
Goldson 6

Propper 7
Stephens 7
Gross 6
March 7

Hemed 6
 




chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
14,636
Hughton 0 Tactically terrible, didn't make any changes to help the team. Badly outclassed today.

Such as ? What could he have done. He made 5 changes to the team, picked an entirely different formation, played 3 at the back for the first time and brought on all 3 subs.
Is it bring Baldock and Izquierdo on earlier ? Anything else ?
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,280
Cumbria
All this about Stephens and his passing. Granted, some of them might go astray - but looking at any stats site shows his successful pass rate is about 85%, better than any other player we have. And looking at this diagram, in the Chelsea game his pass rate was 88% - higher than his average. And the arrows don't really reflect this negativity about all his passes being backwards or sideways, according to the more detailed stats 36% of his passes against Chelsea were backwards.

DS1.JPG
 


Ninja Elephant

Doctor Elephant
Feb 16, 2009
18,855
Such as ? What could he have done. He made 5 changes to the team, picked an entirely different formation, played 3 at the back for the first time and brought on all 3 subs.
Is it bring Baldock and Izquierdo on earlier ? Anything else ?

Not played a formation which allowed Hazard and Willian all the time and space they could possibly want, with our three centre backs marking just one striker and leaving space all over the place.

The tactics were wrong, the lack of balls to change the shape when it was clear we were hopelessly exposed is just as bad. There was never a chance that he would change the shape, despite the obvious failure of the tactics - and that cost us the game. Chelsea were there for the taking really, but we played so completely into their hands.

That said, we did have a go, but that's the very minimum in a game of football.
 




Brighton Mod

Its All Too Beautiful
Ryan 6 - a couple of really decent saves. Could do nothing about the goals
Schellotto 8 an action packed performance. Our best attacking player who could have won two pens and scored MOTM
Goldson 5 - outclassed
Duffy 5 - looked dead on his feet, punch drunk, concussed
Dunk 5 - marginally better than his defensive partners but some costly errors in possession
Suttner 5 - totally overshadowed by Schellotto on the other wing
Stephens 5 - see Dunk. Just kept losing the ball
Propper 7 - unleashed by the formation. Looked a different player and very nearly scored
Gros 6 - busy but not very effective
March 7 - another really good game from Solly. A proper threat
Hemed 6 - should have buried that header

Subs all 5 - on positive influence on the match

Hughton 7 - he CHANGED something. Okay, it didn’t work but i’d Rather us play like that and lose 4-0 than play like we did against West Brom and lose 2-0

The description of Duffy being punch drunk is right on the nail. Been like it for a few games now, not sure whats going on with him, does he have some distraction off the field?
 




Munkfish

Well-known member
May 1, 2006
12,090
The description of Duffy being punch drunk is right on the nail. Been like it for a few games now, not sure whats going on with him, does he have some distraction off the field?

Probably been booted out by the Mrs for shagging munters from Lancing.
 








sussex_guy2k2

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2014
4,083
Not played a formation which allowed Hazard and Willian all the time and space they could possibly want, with our three centre backs marking just one striker and leaving space all over the place.

The tactics were wrong, the lack of balls to change the shape when it was clear we were hopelessly exposed is just as bad. There was never a chance that he would change the shape, despite the obvious failure of the tactics - and that cost us the game. Chelsea were there for the taking really, but we played so completely into their hands.

That said, we did have a go, but that's the very minimum in a game of football.

It'd be interesting to see just how many managers have changed to a back 3 against Chelsea to combat their system this year. I'd wager a fair few.

As we saw at the weekend, they actually press as a front 3 to lull all 3 CBs into thinking they're marking someone, but when on the ball, they drop into really intelligent positions between the wide CBs and the midfield pair who are often caught between pressing (in this case Kante and Bakayoko) or dropping to shield the space that the front 3 (in this case Willian and Hazard) want to drop into. That plus the interchangeability actually make it debatable whether a back 3 is the way to go as often (as you pointed out) only one striker is actually being marked but there's a load of space free for attackers to roam into because our midfield two aren't sure whether to sit or press. It would probably make more sense to pick a back four against them and then have two deeper midfielders sit to pick up the space. Allowing Kante and Bakayoko the space to dictate the game from deeper positions could be a problem, but if you cut off the passing lanes into Hazard and Willian/Pedro and cut out the space they have to work in, then there's potentially a winning defensive formula there.
 






sussex_guy2k2

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2014
4,083
All this about Stephens and his passing. Granted, some of them might go astray - but looking at any stats site shows his successful pass rate is about 85%, better than any other player we have. And looking at this diagram, in the Chelsea game his pass rate was 88% - higher than his average. And the arrows don't really reflect this negativity about all his passes being backwards or sideways, according to the more detailed stats 36% of his passes against Chelsea were backwards.

View attachment 93352

All interesting. I think the biggest issue with Stephens is that when he gets caught in possession, commits a foul or gets dispossessed, it's always in an awful position which, at this level, tends to lead to the opposition creating chances or having a shot on goal. At the weekend, the only person dispossessed more than him was Hemed, and alongside Duffy he committed the most fouls. Because of the above stated reasoning, it just sticks in the mind that bit more...
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,956
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
Duffy's levels may have dropped slightly but a long way from being left out of the side for me.

Stephens getting a hard time from Saturday also uncalled for, I thought he had a decent game, it bloody hard work in there, especially with the likes of Hazzard and Willian dropping into those areas.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here