Garry Nelson's Left Foot
Well-known member
Re: Re: Re: Re: Player and Stadium ratings
1: That's a wild supposition. Why would Mcghee cut off his nose tospite his face? We're not so good that we can afford to do that at any stage this season.
2: We know that McGhee plays players out of position. We don't have a big squad so players have to be flexible. Look how many players weren't playing in their preferred positions yesterday- Reid, Hammond, Knight, Robinson, CKR(if you believe the argument that he's actually an attacking midfielder.) Players have to accept it and get on with it. Hammond, Knight, Reid and CKR have. If Robinson was ineffectual yesterday(and i'm not saying he was the only one), maybe it's a sign that he's not ready for the first team just yet. If he has to play as a striker, then maybe there isn't enough to his game yet to warrant inclusion from the start as I would argue that Leon Knight is ahead of him in the 'little man' pecking order and it's probably not the wisest thing to play a strike force whose combined height doesn't reach 6 foot...
So if you want players to play in their natural positions then wouldn't Leon be the better option upfront? And likewise wouldn't CKR drop into midfield and El Turi/McCammon a.n other be his partner?
It seems to me that whenever Jake has come off the bench he's had rave reviews. Surely that's the wisest way to use him for now. The responsibilities of starting a game and coming off the bench are very different. Let's give the lad some time to develop as a player. I think we should be arguing for Jake to be brought on earlier in a game, not demanding that he starts.
3: That should go in the knee-jerk reaction thread.
Desert Orchid said:No way! Jake was so wide in that midfield, he'd have been in the stand if he'd gone any further. It has been suggested on another website that McGhee stuck him so far out there in order to turn round and say 'told you so' to those who want him in the team. I can't believe McGhee would do that.
Jake is a striker. We need more than 1 player up front as CKR needs support, Turienzo's control is debatable (to say the least) and Trolley is inept. It's a radical departure I know, but it might be an idea to play Jake in position - rather than hang him out to dry after 45 minutes out of position when he was no worse than most of the others anyway.
Keep this up and we'll get relegated playing 4-5-1, losing 2 promising young strikers while doing so. Hopefully McGhee's post-match comments indicate he realises we need 2 up front.
1: That's a wild supposition. Why would Mcghee cut off his nose tospite his face? We're not so good that we can afford to do that at any stage this season.
2: We know that McGhee plays players out of position. We don't have a big squad so players have to be flexible. Look how many players weren't playing in their preferred positions yesterday- Reid, Hammond, Knight, Robinson, CKR(if you believe the argument that he's actually an attacking midfielder.) Players have to accept it and get on with it. Hammond, Knight, Reid and CKR have. If Robinson was ineffectual yesterday(and i'm not saying he was the only one), maybe it's a sign that he's not ready for the first team just yet. If he has to play as a striker, then maybe there isn't enough to his game yet to warrant inclusion from the start as I would argue that Leon Knight is ahead of him in the 'little man' pecking order and it's probably not the wisest thing to play a strike force whose combined height doesn't reach 6 foot...
So if you want players to play in their natural positions then wouldn't Leon be the better option upfront? And likewise wouldn't CKR drop into midfield and El Turi/McCammon a.n other be his partner?
It seems to me that whenever Jake has come off the bench he's had rave reviews. Surely that's the wisest way to use him for now. The responsibilities of starting a game and coming off the bench are very different. Let's give the lad some time to develop as a player. I think we should be arguing for Jake to be brought on earlier in a game, not demanding that he starts.
3: That should go in the knee-jerk reaction thread.