Pictures in signatures?

[MrShaun15]

just a random question

why cant we have pictures in signatures?!

just made this and I cant use it! >.<

 

[HalfTimeOrange]

Upload it to an image hosting/sharing website..put the image forum link in your signature...sorted.

 

[MrShaun15]

Upload it to an image hosting/sharing website..put the image forum link in your signature...sorted.

i did and previewed it and i just got the text...

 

[HalfTimeOrange]

i did and previewed it and i just got the text...

Oh right, erm....i'm out of ideas then

 

[mcshane in the 79th]

Signatures are ghey.

 

[MrShaun15]

there disabled on the forum for some reason

 

[footychick]

Shame, they'd be cool

 

[Lord Bracknell]

They are tedious and intrusive.

 

[philsussex]

That one does look good though

 

[Fungus]

there disabled on the forum for some reason

But Mr Orange has one...

Oh, and for the sake of complete pedantry I should say "it's THEY'RE disabled". No offence, like.

 

[Everest]

But Mr Orange has one...

Oh, and for the sake of complete pedantry I should say it's "THEY'RE disabled". No offence, like.

Corrected

 

[MrShaun15]

They are tedious and intrusive.

bleugh! they would be cool =/ and mr orange is just a random picture like the amex in mine

 

[surrey jim]

I would imagine they would take up a lot of bandwidth on the site and therefore have been disabled.

 

[Bozza]

Images in signatures are turned off because they look shit. Boards that allow large graphical signatures look horrendous to my eye and the discussion, that should be the main focus, seems almost an afterthought as the reader is distracted by all manner of brightly coloured large graphical monstrosities.

You can 'express yourself' graphically with both your avatar and your profile picture, as well as being able to modify your profile page. Additionally you can a reasonable degree of latitude with the signature itself.

I've had signatures and avatars turned off when I view NSC for years now - it is a far cleaner way of using the site. Briefly, when NSC logs me out for some reason, I become exposed to the hell that are the avatars and signatures that people use and my eyes bleed.

 

[mcshane in the 79th]

Images in signatures are turned off because they look shit. Boards that allow large graphical signatures look horrendous to my eye and the discussion, that should be the main focus, seems almost an afterthought as the reader is distracted by all manner of brightly coloured large graphical monstrosities.

You can 'express yourself' graphically with both your avatar and your profile picture, as well as being able to modify your profile page. Additionally you can a reasonable degree of latitude with the signature itself.

I've had signatures and avatars turned off when I view NSC for years now - it is a far cleaner way of using the site. Briefly, when NSC logs me out for some reason, I become exposed to the hell that are the avatars and signatures that people use and my eyes bleed.

Word. Clutter clutter clutter

 

[JBizzle]

Images in signatures are turned off because they look shit. Boards that allow large graphical signatures look horrendous to my eye and the discussion, that should be the main focus, seems almost an afterthought as the reader is distracted by all manner of brightly coloured large graphical monstrosities.

You can 'express yourself' graphically with both your avatar and your profile picture, as well as being able to modify your profile page. Additionally you can a reasonable degree of latitude with the signature itself.

I've had signatures and avatars turned off when I view NSC for years now - it is a far cleaner way of using the site. Briefly, when NSC logs me out for some reason, I become exposed to the hell that are the avatars and signatures that people use and my eyes bleed.

I agree. I was having a laugh reading the Swindon Town forum (Jonathan Douglas would never leave for a club like Brighton, Greer was having an affair with another players wife etc) and there is one poster who has a massive photo of the crowd as his signature. Every time he posted, all you could see was one line followed by a huge photo of their fans. Only get 1 or 2 posts before having to scroll down again!

 

[Billy the Fish]

I've had signatures and avatars turned off when I view NSC for years now - it is a far cleaner way of using the site. Briefly, when NSC logs me out for some reason, I become exposed to the hell that are the avatars and signatures that people use and my eyes bleed.

This, as they say.


So much easier to read without having to look at someone else's idea of being wacky

 

[Westdene Seagull]

Images in signatures are turned off because they look shit. Boards that allow large graphical signatures look horrendous to my eye and the discussion, that should be the main focus, seems almost an afterthought as the reader is distracted by all manner of brightly coloured large graphical monstrosities.

You can 'express yourself' graphically with both your avatar and your profile picture, as well as being able to modify your profile page. Additionally you can a reasonable degree of latitude with the signature itself.

I've had signatures and avatars turned off when I view NSC for years now - it is a far cleaner way of using the site. Briefly, when NSC logs me out for some reason, I become exposed to the hell that are the avatars and signatures that people use and my eyes bleed.

Agree with the signature bit but I like avatars - I identify people by them - I guess my mind sees them as a visual representation of the poster that I have never met and so can't put a face to the name.

 

[KneeOn]

Agree with the signature bit but I like avatars - I identify people by them - I guess my mind sees them as a visual representation of the poster that I have never met and so can't put a face to the name.

Shucks you must think i'm a beaut!

 

[Westdene Seagull]

Shucks you must think i'm a beaut!

I'm very glad you post a lot