A veritable panoply of posters on this thread with whom I suspect I'd disagree about most political topics. But not this one. Signed.
If there was a 'shoot to kill policy' it was wrong and people should be brought to book. But those people sure as hell ain't Private Fit-up and the rest of the 1st Scapegoat regiment .
This is about allegations of torture, is it not?
Is there not a special responsibility that sits upon the shoulders of our armed forces - including compliance with the letter of the law that forbids the use of torture to obtain confessions? I can't see a case for absolute immunity from prosecution. By all means allow a defence that recognises the particular circumstances of each case, but beware of anything that appears to licence torture.
Interesting
[tweet]827127543572598784[/tweet]
I understand what you are saying, Buzzer, but in my view there is an over-riding factor that can't be ignored. It's whether the Peace Process might be threatened by a change in current practice. It's a few years since I last visited Northern Ireland, but I can recall quite clearly conversations I had with former (protestant) activists who could see the benefits of a lasting "peace and reconciliation" process.
It may be that things are particularly volatile at the moment. All the more reason to be very careful how sensitive matters inherited from the past are handled. And that applies to McGrory as well.
At the rate these things are escalating into War Crimes I'm now waiting for a knock on the door for my part in programming nuclear weapons towards Russia and other unnamed countries in the Cold War