Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
I replied to a quote yesterday saying we’re held back because TB refuses to break the model of how the club operates. Last night the manager was blamed, spending was blamed etc.Are people blaming the running of the club? Are people saying we should change how we run the club? Genuine questions. I've not trawled through all the threads.
I know there is a thread titled something along the lines of 'lack of depth will cost us'. It's a view point I have some sympathy with. We've lost, and not replaced, three senior players this season - Bissouma, Mwepu and Trossard.
Bissouma and Trossard have been replaced in the team by Caicedo and Mitoma but their place in the squad hasn't. If we still had all three of those players I am convinced not only would we have more points but we'd be in the top four.
So in that sense I think it's fair to say that a lack of depth is hurting us in the context of a European push. In the larger context of what our club is historically and where we were 25 years ago it's incredible to be able to say we lack depth when we have teenage Paraguayan, Argentinian and Swedish internationals on the bench.
In the big picture arc of history it's mind blowing where we're at. Likewise it's o.k to be disappointed if we fall short of Europe when you consider our history. It's undreamed of success and might not come around again. I don't think that constitutes entitlement.
The squad is the thing that got us here, the target being steering clear of relegation and competing in the top 10.
15 months ago that target seemed a long way off. Now squad depth is going to cost us Europe (it might not…) even though squad depth has meant we will exceed our set targets. Europe is only there because we’ve exceeded expectations, it’s a funny turn of phrase to say squad depth will then cost us.