Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
Well its obviously a penalty - surely we're not going to let this become a narrative. Veltman has got too focused on the dark arts and its bitten us on the arse
We do have to find this out - but its not something that happens overnight.By quibbling about the pen, we're just looking for excuses for our abject performance.
Penalty or not we HAVE to sort our home form out. Even without the pen it would have been 0-0 and yet another disappointing point. We HAVE to start taking (and creating) more chances otherwise Mid Table will be where we finish.
Everton might be anti-football but we have to find a way to get around such teams. It's been our problem for far too long.
Really?Foul first, handball second. Should be simple for VAR to clarify..... Oh.
Mid-table this season. Push on next….hopefullyWe do have to find this out - but its not something that happens overnight.
And of course we will finish midtable this season, and thats fine
It was a foul. These are given ALL THE TIME against us. Veltman was at full sprint and got nudged over.
BUT, because the ref did not give the foul, it has to be a penalty with VAR in my opinion. Veltman swiped the ball away after he’d been fouled. He pushed his dark arts too far which I get, because the ref had been decent up until then.
Unfortunately, the ref can’t disagree with VAR because he has already concluded it was not a foul so the only conclusion is a penalty.
It’s like when a player is fouled and handles the ball before the ref has blown resulting in a handball.
Veltman cost us because the ref missed the foul.
Which part of the Everton player pushing Veltman on his shoulder into the ball and barging him sideways is not a foul?Veltman was not fouled. Veltman did what he often does and pretended he was fouled. We praise him when he is brilliant like against Ipswich but that was awful defending. Ridiculous.