[Albion] Pedro

[Codner pharmaceuticals]

Two words:

Five Subs.

Imagine we are winning in our new world 6-4 at half time - we want to consolidate so we can bring on 2 new wingers and a new #10 and scrape through with a 9-6 win.

 

[Machiavelli]

I think it's more likely a Bissouma/Caicedo situation - planning for the inevitable (if things go well) maybe next summer?

I don't think Pedro will go anywhere. But, if he does, it'll only be for an eye-watering amount. So it's almost a win-win (as long as the goals keep coming).


Mind you, Dwayne said he's shitehouse, so it doesn't matter anyway.

£100m bid incoming then.

 

[NorthstandRacoon]

No, really cannot see it. We would know by know, club are just finally using their funds wisely to give us the best possible chance.

 

[warmleyseagull]

Exactly, and we'll need them more than ever now we're in Europe.

Shit, wrong season.

I'm feeling all Carabao.

 

[HangletonGull]

In my opinion no chance is Pedro off this window

 

[Bring back Bryan wade!!]

Well, there literally IS a chance. It might be very unlikely, but it could happen...

It won’t

 

[Easy 10]

He's under contract till 2028. It would take ridiculous money to prise him away.

 

[Han Solo]

squad game , 2 players per position

We paid the price for not having this last season

2 players per position = 22 players

Currently there's 37 players in the first team squad.

Its not exactly an argument for him staying... quite the opposite.

Anyway, I don't think Joao Pedro will move this summer, because he a) should be able to get a lot better (more valuable) and b) he didn't perform good enough last season to really be a top target.

That said, Manchester City are looking for a backup striker and its more likely to be somenone in the £50-60m-ish category than the £100m category. It cant be ruled out that they consider him as a target.

 

[severnside gull]

He's under contract till 2028. It would take ridiculous money to prise him away.

Lets hope he doesn’t have a release clause

 

[Gully Forever]

I don't understand why people think we need to sell players when we buy new players.
we need 25 premier league players. NOT 11.

 

[redoubtable seagull]

If he was then it would be to one of the supposed top PL clubs and if that were the case there’d be leaks galore by Fabrizio and numerous ITK clickbait sites.

 

[Oh_aye]

I would say it's more likely we might loan Ferguson out, to get fitness and confidence back.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

I would say it's more likely we might loan Ferguson out, to get fitness and confidence back.

I'd like to see him loaned out to Celtic for the season. Bang in a shedload of goals, get a bit more European experience and a near-guaranteed Scottish Premiership winners medal at the end of it. Then come back fully fit and brimming with confidence

 

[Lawros Lip]

Could he be seen as a squad replacement for Undav who I imagine we would have kept had he wanted to stick around?

 

[Han Solo]

I don't understand why people think we need to sell players when we buy new players.
we need 25 premier league players. NOT 11.

Ok and now there's A LOT more than 25 players, so players needs to be sold or loaned out.

 

[Han Solo]

Could he be seen as a squad replacement for Undav who I imagine we would have kept had he wanted to stick around?

Pedro as the replacement for Undav?

 

[Lawros Lip]

Pedro as the replacement for Undav?

Ha, ha. No Rutter in reference to speculation earlier in thread as to why we needed him.

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

I would say it's more likely we might loan Ferguson out, to get fitness and confidence back.

I would imagine there is close to zero chance of Ferguson being loaned out, in my opinion like.

 

[Coldeanseagull]

Ok and now there's A LOT more than 25 players, so players needs to be sold or loaned out.

I'm sure the U21's don't count towards the 25 and seeing as most of our squad are still breast feeding, we should be ok

 

[Baldseagull]

Pedro as the replacement for Undav?

Rutter