She said at the time that there would be people trying to make guess from athletes data, without understanding the data, and jumping to the wrong conclusions. Seems she was right.I thought it was strange when she was against releasing blood data
The press door stepped her for a comment shortly after the commons debate, she did not know the details only what the press told her, basically she has been set up by the Press, very naive and stupid given her experience and age in reacting so personally.I would be astonished if Paula Radcliffe is a drugs cheat. It's also appalling that she's being implicated through innuendo delivered under cover of parliamentary privilege. It's interesting that the Tory know-nothing who was responsible has been back-pedalling today.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/c...ent-2015/chairs-statement-blood-doping-15-16/
I think this was very brave of The Times to go after athletics like this. Their journalistic integrity was such that they never considered the impact on key sponsors and how this could affect the extensive athletics coverage on Sky Sports. Oh hang on a sec ?
I'm team Paula. I actually used to know her and I can state that her cock and balls looked perfectly normal to me.
I would be amazed if she was involved and simply dont believe she has ever cheated, probably one of the most outspoken athletes against Drug use, even in her prime as an athlete she campaigned against it.
She said at the time that there would be people trying to make guess from athletes data, without understanding the data, and jumping to the wrong conclusions. Seems she was right.
We'll probably never know. However the scientific data looks a bit worrying to me. She may have been blood doping out of competition. It's very suspicious.
I don't want to get in racial issues, but long distance running in the modern era seems to be dominated by African runners, men and women. The London marathon is almost spot the white person in the 2nd group chasing pack. Paula Radciffe's world record is incredible when considering this, her record in the Olympics is maybe where her level should be.
Is that because their bodies are better suited to it, or because of a combination of how popular long distance running is in a few countries and how many long distance runners live at altitude, which is better preparation for a long distance athlete? I don't know if there are any good Chinese cricket players, but if there aren't I doubt it's because of their bodies, and if there is one, it doesn't mean they're doping.I don't want to get in racial issues, but long distance running in the modern era seems to be dominated by African runners, men and women. The London marathon is almost spot the white person in the 2nd group chasing pack.
There isn't much point blood doping out of competition - usually this is the time to remove said blood for reinfusion prior to racing.We'll probably never know. However the scientific data looks a bit worrying to me. She may have been blood doping out of competition. It's very suspicious.
It's a combination of these as discussed by David epstein in the sports gene. The kalenjin tribe account for a huge proportion of the fastest times run over marathon and 10k. They have hundreds of people hitting Olympic qualifying each time.Is that because their bodies are better suited to it, or because of a combination of how popular long distance running is in a few countries and how many long distance runners live at altitude, which is better preparation for a long distance athlete? I don't know if there are any good Chinese cricket players, but if there aren't I doubt it's because of their bodies, and if there is one, it doesn't mean they're doping.
Or perhaps because they are allowed to develop in a system exploiting a near non existent testing policy.Is that because their bodies are better suited to it, or because of a combination of how popular long distance running is in a few countries and how many long distance runners live at altitude, which is better preparation for a long distance athlete?.
SB, you know that I'm usually in agreement with you here as the Kenyan anti-doping effort is, at best, a very leaky sieve (much like Jamaica but that's a whole other conversation), but it's not all doping.Or perhaps because they are allowed to develop in a system exploiting a near non existent testing policy.
A la East Germany through the 70's and 80's and China 10 years ago.
Oh definitely I was going to make your final point, but I ran out of energy.SB, you know that I'm usually in agreement with you here as the Kenyan anti-doping effort is, at best, a very leaky sieve (much like Jamaica but that's a whole other conversation), but it's not all doping.
There are well documented cases of extraordinary early talent pools of kids running in bare feet to school every day and people taking up running in their 20s and running 2.10 marathons a year later - the genetics are there.
Obviously it is best to dope those who are already massively talented. No amount of armtsrong-esque doping could win me a tour de france!