No, there is nothing worse than going into the unknown. His fear and reaction was GENUINE. Brilliant to watch though.clapham_gull said:Something in me suspects that he made that look more difficult than he really found it....... ?
Gullet said:No, there is nothing worse than going into the unknown. His fear and reaction was GENUINE. Brilliant to watch though.
Would you like to exagerate?clapham_gull said:I've stuck my hands in worse places than that - and the light was off.
Gullet said:Would you like to exagerate?
What was HIS name?clapham_gull said:It was a hairy bush tucker trial.
wrexhamgnasher said:Lay off Burrell
He's arguments with Janet are hilarous!
His fear in the trials is genuine. How many of you lot would dig under a rats ass for a star or go straight over 2 snakes.
I was trying to think if it was worse going into something when you know whats in it or is it worse going into something you can see.
It's worse when you can't see whats in there because you don't where the animals are.
On top of that Burrell has (according to newspaper reports) promised to give money to Wrexham (as hes a fan )
Easy 10 said:The bloke is a complete DRAMA QUEEN over everything. Did you see his "Paul Alcock" stagger-back and fall just after last nights trial, as though his legs had just given way ? Dear oh dear. He really does milk every trial for all its worth, and whimpers his way through them to try to emphasise what a staggering ordeal it all is. That treasure chest one he did with Nancy, when he had to shuffle along those ropes, the guy was almost in tears. "I'm doing this for YOU Nancy, I'm doing it all for you darling..." (sob sob).
He'll probably win though. There is something vaguely endearing about him that I can't quite put my finger on. And you certainly can't call him boring, he HAS been very entertaining.