It's YOUR fault for not having twins
Its actually my wife's fault - if she'd crossed her legs for about another 8 hours, on 9th August 1998, I'd be paying £200 less for the two lads' tickets this season...
It's YOUR fault for not having twins
Its actually my wife's fault - if she'd crossed her legs for about another 8 hours, on 9th August 1998, I'd be paying £200 less for the two lads' tickets this season...
Interesting, very interesting.
I wonder what that means.
To be honest it's not FFP that is the problem, in fact that is very commendable and in the ideal world would go further.
The real devil in the whole set up is parachute payments, which urgently need to be scrapped or reformed.
If the payments cannot be scrapped, then clubs that draw on them need to be handed a strict transfer embago. No longer can we see situations where parachute payments can be used to bring in new players ( ie Wayne Bridge to Reading ).
I see parachute payments need to be available to stop teams going bust, but the penalty for actually drawing on the money needs to be strict.
Any parachute money not drawn on could go to charity. Everyone would be a winner.
Fair comment. I'm not sure it tells us anything new though.
Maybe it's too much to ask, but given the transfer fees received from selling players I wonder if we are on course to have dramatically reduced the loss.
The concern expressed by some was that we were making a loss of approx £1million per month through to the last year end. Given the player sales and the assumption that the operating profit before player sales is improving does that still mean we are losing £1million a month.
A secondary question is if we are still losing £1m after everything Paul Barber has done to try and reduce this and the player sales, how can this be sustainable.
Tony Bloom has already invested £200million plus, does he really want to invest a further £12million every single year? No one would blame him if he said no at some point.
So is there a plan to break even in the near future or is it hang on as best we can until we reach the premiership?
I would suggest that the current situation, as reported, is not sustainable and if we are to take what Paul Barber has said to be true we are never going to be a contender for promotion.
bottom line is we are one of the most expensive clubs in the country, and losing 1m a month, something is wrong somewhere, and it does seem that adhering to FFP does not make a jot of difference.
putting pressure on fans to stump up more is just going to alienate some and they the club will lose them, after working so hard to get them.
There is a massive loophole in FFP and the likes of QPR and Forest have found it, it will just be time till we find out what they have found will hold up in a court of law
So how were Palace and Burnley promoted in the last two seasons?
You have to balance the options;
1. Go for it spend money and hope for promotion and the pot of gold it brings.
2. Prudent spending to keep the club solvent but not diminishing ambition.
I believe we tried option 1 under Gus and it failed we are now engaged on option 2. I honestly believe that we will eventually reach the Premier based on player ability rather than big spending.
As soon as we find a player of ability we flog them on to the first club to make a decent offer. Have absolutely no doubt that the same will happen when the academy production line starts rolling.
Can't see any serious option other than 1. unless there's a plan to re-distribute FFP fines from those that most openly flaunt it to those that do most to adhere to it.
The problem with option 1 is what if you don't go up? Importantly what if by exceeding FFP restrictions the club is put under a transfer embargo? Surely that only makes the situation worse?
Conversely, if you try and tread water forever in the same division on a (comparatively) shoestring budget then you only need to get it wrong once and you're seriously struggling in a downward spiral of falling gates and mass exodus of half-decent players - with no parachute payments to soften the fall.
Let's hear it then. Your starting point is where we are currently: in the Amex with c22,000 season ticket holders, a strong squad commanding decent wages and ongoing operating losses.
Tell us where the club should be and how you would get it there.
It is like the past two seasons never happened.
Oh sure, but that's why it's not a binary choice. It's a very difficult balancing act between investment, losses, debt, infrastructure improvements, on pitch performance and the effect those said performances have on fans. They're a horrible spider's web of interconnected factors, and I'm impressed that anyone's ever managed to unravel all the threads and find a formula that just about works.
Burnley....
Palace