Which is great, except the Girls themselves haven't got a problem with it and asked to carry on dancing - not sure why you're so desperate back Barber up on this one.
Is it because the obvious reason is hiding in plain sight?
you've lost me there
Agreed back at you but lets not forget that Sussex Police have publicly stated that they didn't really have a problem with it.
I know, just carry on blaming Barber if it suits you.
I've not blamed him for anything, just fascinated by the people backing him when all he's done is warn us that we're making a loss, and put the prices up as a reaction.
I've not blamed him for anything, just fascinated by the people backing him when all he's done is warn us that we're making a loss, and put the prices up as a reaction.
I would have thought that pricing is part of his remit. And how many I ask is that fishing Unless you think £2 for a paper cup full of hot water and a spoon full of bovril is fair enough.
Isn't that the right thing to do though?
Re the others, guess we'll have to judge him on the next two sets of accounts.
Judging him on the ones soon to be released won't tell you anything about him.
Exactly, that's why you'll need to compare and contrast the two sets of accounts.
Which two?
I would have thought that pricing is part of his remit. And how many I ask is that fishing Unless you think £2 for a paper cup full of hot water and a spoon full of bovril is fair enough.
The next two. Those soon to be released (Pre-Barber) and those released in Spring 2014 (post Barber)
It's not so much when he started, as when his first marketing plan kicks in. The club is probably still operating to a plan that was instigated before he arrived, unless he came in and tore everything up after five minutes - which he almost certainly didn't. I think the more telling one will be the year after - when his own schemes and schmoozing properly kick in. (Jul 2013 - June 2014).