Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,686
Stephens, Propper, Gross and Mooy all on that Prem Top 20 distance covered list.
bit of pace on the flanks and up front .... it might just work out.
Stephens, Propper, Gross and Mooy all on that Prem Top 20 distance covered list.
Don't be a bellend or literally can you not read? I haven't said I want to drop him, I have said if you can't play him up front then don't play him?Does WeBoughtTheTitleStandChat have a thread suggesting kev dB should be dropped.
Or WeWillChokeAgainStandChat have fans calling out Salah.
Or are we alone when it comes to dingleberry supporters?
And this is my point Easy! Trossard came in and we went with 3 up top and it changed the game... With PG on the pitch, who played really well as one of 3 up to earlier in the season, why not go to that at half time before making the sub.... Gross would have played far better than he did if he was given the role that Trossard was givenI like Gross but he was COMPLETELY anonymous for most of the game, and was rightly binned. I don't think he touched the ball after half time.
But Pirlo could put in a tackle and win a header, Gross can do neither so consequently is a liability in midfieldNo coincidence that some of our worst football is when he is not playing.
Hughton teams particularly really suffered without him.
Very intelligent, Pirlo didn’t have much pace either, sometimes it just isn’t required.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As an all round footballer, for contribution to team tactics over 90 mins, is overrated.
I fully accept his stats can be truly brilliant, comparable to many of the top players in the league, but although he runs a lot, he is very slow and in reality, is a luxury player.
When he can play as one of 2 or 3 forwards, I can really see what he adds and think we can afford to carry his limitations.
My issue is every time he is played as any sort of midfielder. When he has defensive responsibilities, and a set role that his opposite number knows he has, he is just too predictable and too easy for the opposition to play against. I also feel when he is in midfield, players near to him have worse games because they have to cover him, notably Burn, Stephens and Proper yesterday.
I do really think Gross has a huge role to play for the club now and moving forward, but I really feel that if we can't play him up front, he shouldn't play at all.
#awaitsflaming
Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
The most intelligent footballer we have, and integral to almost everything we do going forward.
To accommodate Trossard, I can only really see us reverting to one up front (which is what Potter did for two of Trossard's three starts before his injury), which probably means Connolly will make way for him.
That said - the one time we started with two strikers and Trossard, which was Southampton at home - Gross was on the bench. March and Trossard started either side of Stephens and Propper with Maupay and (briefly) Adone up front.
And this is my point Easy! Trossard came in and we went with 3 up top and it changed the game... With PG on the pitch, who played really well as one of 3 up to earlier in the season, why not go to that at half time before making the sub.... Gross would have played far better than he did if he was given the role that Trossard was given
Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
Absolutely, if anything it felt un potter like to wait till when we did for the change... If Trossard wasn't fit enough for more than he did, PG could have been played higher up the pitch from much earlier.Indeed. Bold changes that reaped dividends. How refreshing it is to have a manager who thinks on his feet and GOES for it. Just seeing our players flood forward in numbers right at the death to go and win it was a joy to behold.
Indeed. Bold changes that reaped dividends. How refreshing it is to have a manager who thinks on his feet and GOES for it. Just seeing our players flood forward in numbers right at the death to go and win it was a joy to behold.
But Pirlo could put in a tackle and win a header, Gross can do neither so consequently is a liability in midfield
Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
TrueWith respect, if we'd been 2-1 down under Hughton with Trossard sitting on the bench, he would have brought him on too.
True
He'd have left the comfort of Dan Burn's shadow.
Played in front of Bong.
While Stephens and Propper played sideways passes on the toes of D&D.
As poor old Glenn stood in an OFFSIDE position with a vacant expression on his face on the Everton penalty spot, having been flogged to death.
"On the Everton penalty spot"Corrected for you, you are slipping
With respect, if we'd been 2-1 down under Hughton with Trossard sitting on the bench, he would have brought him on too.
I think some of you are misunderstanding my point... The fact his stats are so good is why we need to play him in a position where he can influence the game, not in a rigid midfield position.
Saturday was the first time I have seen GP play him there and I hated watching it. It felt like he was being shoehorned into that position because he couldn't leave him out, but for some reason felt he couldn't play 3 up top on Saturday.
Personally I'd like to see Gross, Trossard and Maupay up top on Saturday with Connelly to come off the bench
Sent from my JSN-L21 using Tapatalk
With respect, if we'd been 2-1 down under Hughton with Trossard sitting on the bench, he would have brought him on too.