m20gull
Well-known member
I have recently been accused of being a right-winger on the basis of my allegedly Pavlovian criticism of Panorama and the BBC. Time to lay this to rest.
My objection to Panorama is its lazy approach so that it has become not much better than Watchdog.
The last two programmes for me were not political but the Seroxat and Allied Wire & Steel programmes. Both of these were a few anecdotes strung together with some sensationalism, no hard facts, no evidence and no insight.
I pick on these two because in both cases I have some experience. I have been a user of an SSRI (not seroxat) and work in pensions. When you know something of the subject it is easy to spot the lack of insight. What that makes me realise is that on other subjects where I do not have experience, there is likely to be the same lack of insight, the same sensationalism, the same drawing conclusions from little evidence. That's why I don't bother with Panorama, nothing to do with political bias.
My objection to Panorama is its lazy approach so that it has become not much better than Watchdog.
The last two programmes for me were not political but the Seroxat and Allied Wire & Steel programmes. Both of these were a few anecdotes strung together with some sensationalism, no hard facts, no evidence and no insight.
I pick on these two because in both cases I have some experience. I have been a user of an SSRI (not seroxat) and work in pensions. When you know something of the subject it is easy to spot the lack of insight. What that makes me realise is that on other subjects where I do not have experience, there is likely to be the same lack of insight, the same sensationalism, the same drawing conclusions from little evidence. That's why I don't bother with Panorama, nothing to do with political bias.