It simply shouldn't have been given WITH VAR. It doesn't fit with the criteria they use. I just don't understand how these idiots in the VAR studio can go through the criteria and still decide its a red. That's without everyone who's ever watched football already knowing it shouldn't be a red. One of the very worst decisions.I'm not being a contrarian (for a change) it's a shite decision and wouldn't have been given without VAR.
But the boot was inexplicably above the ball and (hardly any) contact was made.
The very type of decision that would have had Roy, palace fans, and pundits screaming for VAR because the referee needs help.