Gritt23
New member
My experience at both ET and High Court would suggest you're wrong.
And my experiences of ET and High Court are clearly not the same as yours. We cannot be expected to leave a crucial role effectively vacant while this all plays out. We have already done that for long enough so as not to suggest the disciplinary was a foregone conclusion. We now appoint Oscar, give him a slightly different title, and that is then not an issue.
If we were expected to leave the role open until Gus was totally satisfied, and not bringing any further case to an ET, it would be giving him FAR too much power over us. Also, while he is time barred in bringing his appeal, he has plenty of time to bring a case to ET, and has to demonstrate absolutely no grounds before bringing it to the ET. No company could be expected to leave the role vacant for that length of time.
We have a business to run here, and a responsibility to numerous other employees. What they are doing is absolutely fine. What they did previously may NOT be, but appointing a Head Coach or Interim Manager today will have no bearing whatsoever.