Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Organ Donation

Organ donation should always be....

  • Opt In

    Votes: 14 31.8%
  • Opt Out

    Votes: 30 68.2%

  • Total voters
    44


Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
But surely that's taking into account that you go somewhere when you die?

After you die your body just beomes tissue surely? What's the point of it being put in a hole in the ground when it could have saved someone's life?

as i said, i am on the donor list, so when i do snuff it then hopefully my body will do some good in the world

there are people out there though who wouldnt want to give organs for their own personal reasons. to assume that because somebody hasn't opted out that they would be perfectly happy to have theirs given away would be naive, especially as we live in a society now were the letter of the law is based around facts, as opposed to asumptions
 




1066familyman

Radio User
Jan 15, 2008
15,235
But surely that's taking into account that you go somewhere when you die?

After you die your body just beomes tissue surely? What's the point of it being put in a hole in the ground when it could have saved someone's life?

Glad you used the ?'s :)
 


1066familyman

Radio User
Jan 15, 2008
15,235
there are people out there though who wouldnt want to give organs for their own personal reasons. to assume that because somebody hasn't opted out that they would be perfectly happy to have theirs given away would be naive, especially as we live in a society now were the letter of the law is based around facts, as opposed to asumptions


Spot on !

Unfortunately, that's the arrogance of 'medical science' for you though.
 


Jul 5, 2003
12,644
Chertsey
ON BALANCE I totally agree with you, I believe doctors to be primarily motivated by altruism and I take my hat off to 'em ( though I'm uncomfortable with those who split their time between the NHS and private sector :rant: )

No, I don't trust any government as far as i can throw them.

Personally I'm not a fan of 'medical science'. I don't like the reductionist approach that treats living beings as mere objects to be tinkered with like machines so we can all have longer and longer life spans and enjoy ' better quality of life' ( whatever the f*** that is ! ) It all smacks of eugenics in the long run to me I'm afraid.

I believe your organs belong to you, along with the free will that GOD gave everyone. Do what you like with them. But I don't see why anyone should have to defend their beliefs to anyone if those beliefs ain't hurting anyone.

What do you make of using animal organs in humans ?
Didn't Gordon Brown back mixing animal & human stem cells for research recently ? FRIGHTENING ! :eek:

So what do you do when you need an operation? At the end of the day every medical intervention is 'medical science'. When you look at the quality of life argument, everyone normally thinks of the elderly living longer, but not necessarily better, but when you look at younger people in hospitals, medical science can actually give people a bettr quality of life. Looking at it from a personal rather superficial view - my toe to hand transplant that was done 9 years ago certainly improved my quality of life.

I don't think that god gave me anything, because he doesnt exist in my eyes, so i suppose that religion may play a part in your view about medical science.

If animal organs work in humans, why shouldn't they be used? The useage of pig valves in heart surgery certainly looks interesting, and could save many lives. I'm all for it if it works. I think the fear around it is from the sort of Frankenstein stories really.

The animal / human embryo thing is certainly interesting. Again, if they find a cure for something then surely it's only good? It's not like a mutant baby is going to grow or anything!!!

The main issue when we look at the whole transplant / embryo research is the desperate need for America to allow stem cell research. It would be amazing if some real breakthroughs are made.
 


Lush

Mods' Pet
If animal organs work in humans, why shouldn't they be used? The useage of pig valves in heart surgery certainly looks interesting, and could save many lives. I'm all for it if it works. I think the fear around it is from the sort of Frankenstein stories really.

The animal / human embryo thing is certainly interesting. Again, if they find a cure for something then surely it's only good? It's not like a mutant baby is going to grow or anything!!!

The main issue when we look at the whole transplant / embryo research is the desperate need for America to allow stem cell research. It would be amazing if some real breakthroughs are made.

Exactly. If your mum's Parkinson's Disease could be cured thanks to research using some pig and human cells isn't this an amazing thing, not a frightening thing?
 




The Face

H Block
Jan 24, 2007
699
BN2
Definitely opt out if it means more lives will be saved.

On a similar note, I gave blood for the first time last month - perhaps they should consider a similar system there as it's in short supply. Only 5% of the population are registered donors which is shocking as it makes no difference to the donor themselves (ok maybe a bit of bruising/nausea) whereas it's so vital in saving lives.
 


1066familyman

Radio User
Jan 15, 2008
15,235
So what do you do when you need an operation? At the end of the day every medical intervention is 'medical science'. When you look at the quality of life argument, everyone normally thinks of the elderly living longer, but not necessarily better, but when you look at younger people in hospitals, medical science can actually give people a bettr quality of life. Looking at it from a personal rather superficial view - my toe to hand transplant that was done 9 years ago certainly improved my quality of life.

I don't think that god gave me anything, because he doesnt exist in my eyes, so i suppose that religion may play a part in your view about medical science.

If animal organs work in humans, why shouldn't they be used? The useage of pig valves in heart surgery certainly looks interesting, and could save many lives. I'm all for it if it works. I think the fear around it is from the sort of Frankenstein stories really.

The animal / human embryo thing is certainly interesting. Again, if they find a cure for something then surely it's only good? It's not like a mutant baby is going to grow or anything!!!

The main issue when we look at the whole transplant / embryo research is the desperate need for America to allow stem cell research. It would be amazing if some real breakthroughs are made.

I honestly don't know what I'd do if I needed an operation of any kind. Operations come in all sorts of guises and I'd like to think I'd be able to weigh everything up without compromising my beliefs.

If you believe solely in a physical existence and nothing more, then it's perfectly logical to view all living beings as mere constructions of component parts and treat them accordingly. I happen not to share that view.

Do you honestly not foresee any problems with crossing species ? Blimey, the bodies natural instinct is to reject foreign organs from it's OWN species as it is. :shrug:


My concern about 'quality of life' and today's society is shared by some disability rights campaign groups. If medical science ( accepted, it's a bit of a catch all term and frankenstein stories ARE over played ) and societies law makers had it's way, many of the people I work with on a daily basis wouldn't even be here. And I find that very sad.
 






Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
One thing that just occurred to me is that a lot of people who die will probably not be suitable to donate anyway, if for example they are dying from old age the organs may be too old to be of any real use, or they may themselves be ending their life due to some form of illness or disease that has resulted in organ failure.

I am guessing here, I have no access to any research or figures, that the ideal organ donor is someone who has ended their life unexpectedly or at a fairly young age. I would think it likely that the ideal donor had also led a fairly healthy lifestyle...I suspect that a fairly high proportion of people who die would not be suitable...would you want to inherit the lungs of someone who had died at the age of 60 and who had smoked 40 a day since their late teens...mind you, if it was a matter of life or death it might be a price worth paying.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here