spring hall convert
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #41
How about a trade union boss on £120,000 pound a year living in a social house?
Great whataboutery. Absolutely nothing to do with this and you know it.
How about a trade union boss on £120,000 pound a year living in a social house?
And you arrived at this conclusion how ?
If you believe as I do that Mair is a deranged individual and some kind of neo nazi, why wouldnt this be a likely trigger, irrespective of whether it might be accurate or not.
It beggers belief that you and others can jump from this to the Mail must be implying something more sinister as if somehow loads of white van men are reading it and saying yep I am with Mair on this one.
Its condescending nonesense.
There was no medical evidence that he was deranged.
Deranged enough to inflict pain within a murderous act though. He certainly wasn't 'normal'.
Cold, calculating, evil, but not mentally disturbed. His defence would have used it for mitigating circumstances, if it was so.
Within the arguments of law you are entirely correct but the assumption among 'lay people' would be 'there's something wrong with that one' Deranged behavior has many labels and medical descriptions. Take your pick.
How does someone write a piece like that and sleep at night. Pure evil.
The hyphen is a disgrace. It reads like Jo Cox wouldn't help him, not that he thought she wouldn't help him.
Then by that extension, all killers are deranged. Which is fine if you extend this belief to other perpetrators of terrorist offences in this country. The Daily Mail doesn't.
It's a sickening article. They could have put 'and that the MP wouldn't help him'. Even then.
'Kirklees Council were contacted over Mair’s case'. WHY ? It's as if they are searching for a justification.
Of course, had this been a person of foreign parentage such reasoning and attempts to understand would have been seen as whimsy appeasing and apologetics.
Slowly these publications are pushing the boundaries further.
Oh do get over yourself, its an article that quite clearly offers reference to his xenophobic, racist, neo nazi mentality and how this may well have been the trigger to his crime
You're right, in fact it dominates the article. So why does the headline not really reflect that?
Who FFS cares, ask the headline writer, I dunno, if they had any inclination to do what you guy's keep shrieking saying they are trying to do why then fill up the article with the denegration of his character.
Because it would be impossible not to, they're not stupid, far from it.
However, the headline and the first part of the article (which a lot of readers don't go past) almost exclusively talk about the housing/ immigrant issue.
Fair point, I'll clarify.
- Was there a possibility the house could have been given to a family of immigrants? Yes there was.
- Was that possibility more likely than it being given to a non-immigrant family? No it wasn't.
But my point really is that regardless of that, in the context of this crime, does it really matter?
But that was the story, that it was perhaps the trigger, there isnt any mileage in justifying his action, its a heinous crime, there isn't any feeling from anyone that perhaps he had some valid reason or Jo Cox might have had some level of culpability, I cannot comprehend how you see these things in some low level article outlining what we already know.