Lady Bracknell
Handbag at Dawn
I'll host the pdf downloads when design/words are sorted.
Yorkie said:I've had a reply to my email
There is little to add to my September message about this situation, except to say that the failure of Labour's Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, to make a decision after the initial Inquiry has led to additional costs for all concerned. This includes the club, with its well-known financial problems, and Brighton & Hove City Council - indeed all parties to the Inquiry. The figure of £35,000 was an initial estimate only, although others may have portrayed it as something else, and in fact further specific detail of the costs involved turned out to result in a higher figure. This decision was taken (in public) several weeks ago, so I should be interested to know who has initiated today's flurry of emails, and why he/she chose New Year's Eve
Norman's other comments about timing remain valid, as do his hopes and mine for a speedy outcome this time from the ODPM, which will be in everyone's interests.
Happy New Year!
David Rogers.
roz said:Ah, but he knows where Yorkie lives, doug!
sawardseagulls said:May have already mentioned this - sorry if so - but the Freedom of Infomation Act became law today - maybe could ask Lewes for all relevant information to be made public.
CLIFFLEWES CLIFF said:We have made plans today,some albion fans were down at the pan today,i can assure you we are going to kick arse around Lewes soon!!Falmer may affect our attendances but as footie fans we cannot see the biggest club in Sussex going to the dogs,we are genuine lets do this together!!
samparish said:I don't know what the law would allow us to see, but I'm sure it could be very interesting reading..
Lord Bracknell said:1. They are obviously trying to ensure that the re-opened Inquiry lasts longer than the time initially allocated - thereby guaranteeing that the Inspector's Report fails to get to Prescott in time for a decision to be announced before the General Election;
2. They are either planning to argue a case for other sites apart from their favoured site at Sheepcote Valley, or they are finding that their case for Sheepcote Valley is so unrobust that they are having to throw more money at strengthening it;
3. They are acting against the wishes of most of their Council Taxpayers, who plainly DON'T want the Council wasting money on this ill-conceived and obstructive manoeuvre;
4. They are demonstrating that they couldn't care less whether Sussex has a professional football club with the capability of progressing to the highest level.