gripper stebson
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 6,690
Surely killing in the name of an imaginary bloke in the sky represents a mental health issue?
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
The French just shoot dead people who run amok in public knifing and shooting people, shouldn't we consider doing the same? I'm not overly happy contributing to locking them up for life. Does this make me a bad person or just old and stuck in the past?
No, it does not. I personally was disappointed that the Police at the time did not shoot dead those scum that killed Lee Rigby, and the death sentence would have been quite justified in their case. It was abundantly clear that they were guilty, there could not have been any miscarriage of justice, they had every intention of taking life, and they clearly have never shown any remorse. We now have a situation where their stay will cost hundreds of thousands over many years, and they are likely to negatively influence others in jail regarding radicalisation. That does not mean all systems go to "hang 'em high" as routine punishment, just that in truly exceptional circumstances, which this surely is, it can be justified.
Surely the point is that those particular terrorists want to die in action, for their 'rewards'. The fact that we don't kill them, could act as a deterrent to others who may be tempted to glory in their 'holy fight'. There's no honour in rotting in a cell.
Surely the point is that those particular terrorists want to die in action, for their 'rewards'. The fact that we don't kill them, could act as a deterrent to others who may be tempted to glory in their 'holy fight'. There's no honour in rotting in a cell.
Agreed, the big fear is rotting in a cell somewhere. Being killed serves as a martyr recruiting tool, knowing that if you do it you'll spend the rest of your life in solitary is a tougher deterrent (though you could debate to what extent any deterrent works in such cases).
I was listening to the Media Show on R4 yesterday and they were discussing how some news outlets are moving away from naming those responsible so as to avoid any glorification (and inspire copycat events).
I was listening to the Media Show on R4 yesterday and they were discussing how some news outlets are moving away from naming those responsible so as to avoid any glorification (and inspire copycat events).
3 square meals a day , home comforts ,recreational facilities and priority medical treatment doesn't imo constitute rotting in a cell .
3 square meals a day , home comforts ,recreational facilities and priority medical treatment doesn't imo constitute rotting in a cell .
If that was true wouldn't they kill themselves rather than be captured, or get involved in a shoot out. The Lee Rigby ones seemed to want to revel in what they had done imo
If that was true wouldn't they kill themselves rather than be captured, or get involved in a shoot out.
Surely the point is that those particular terrorists want to die in action, for their 'rewards'. The fact that we don't kill them, could act as a deterrent to others who may be tempted to glory in their 'holy fight'. There's no honour in rotting in a cell.
But they don`t rot in a cell...Human rights dictate they are fed watered supplied with TV Computer etc etc at our expense...I`d be happier with them dead honourable or not. An honourable dead terrorist can do no more harm.
Makes perfect sense deeming them non entities as you say avoiding glorification for the Jihad. What I do not want though is the none reporting or deflecting the issue of terrorism and trying to use another excuse such as mental health or a difference of cultural understanding etc etc. I want it to be called as it is, no hiding or burying the facts, we must know.
A terrorist in prison , will eventually have the opportunity to 'convert' other muslims in prison to their savage cause. Their 'work' is far from over while they are alive.
I kind of get you, I hate how if a white supremacist for example goes and kills a group of people they are called mentally ill and the word terrorist is rarely used. But it goes both ways, they are both terrorists AND mentally deranged, not one or the other.
The police are now saying the suspect, who is a Norwegian of Somali origin, t]