Have I missed something?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Once it's all over, are we all going to get along?
- Thread starter Albumen
- Start date
Have I missed something?
Arthur
Well-known member
Of course not. You've just got to look at the amount of tory bashing threads there are on here still to this day a year after the general election. Christ people still bang on about Thatcher and Blair.....people are just bad losers.
Seagull58
In the Algarve
Stick it up your Juncker.
Machiavelli
Well-known member
Kittens -- whether cute or not -- categorically disrupt serenity. You better agree
Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
I wonder what time I'll do my final EU backed fart?
The Birdman
New member
Going by the polls on NSC it looks like DC will win if he wins by anymore than 25% then we might have the night of the long knifes if it's very close he will have to mend bridges and save it for his book in 5 years time. I would say I expect the DC will have to start trying to reform Europe as I think the pressure will be on again at the next elections. PM questions will be intresting next Wednsday.
Machiavelli
Well-known member
This article pretty much sums up where we are:
The UK is now two nations, staring across a political chasm
What a strange, unsettling, anxious moment this is. I mean that partly in the sense of vote, but also of the emotions that are still raw after the death of Jo Cox, and what the last month or so has highlighted about the state of what we must still call the United Kingdom. Many people knew the rough story, of course: of a country cleaved by rising inequality, prone to great outbursts of anger and frustration, and now in the midst of its own version of US-style culture wars – a picture, in fact, that now applies to much of Europe, and is coming into even sharper focus in America itself. But if the build-up to the referendum has told us anything, it is that all this has reached a disturbing peak.
On Tuesday I was in Northampton’s market square, and finding leave voters was a cinch. One or two, just to make this clear, were plain racist, but the majority were not: they talked about immigration, but in the context of jobs, housing and all the rest. An hour later I was on a London tube train sprinkled with successful-looking professionals, a few of whom had “Stronger in” stickers on their Herschel rucksacks and laptop bags. They would presumably echo the views of leave voters that a young woman about to go to university had expressed in Northampton. She talked about their supposed view of immigrants: “They think they’re stealing our jobs … bringing in crime and terrorism. It’s just nonsense.”
Two nations, in short, are staring at each other across a political chasm. To make things worse, while the rightwing press have been up to their usual disgraceful tricks, the parts of the media that might offer a counterbalance have mostly failed to understand that it is the restive mood of millions of people – not David Cameron or Jeremy Corbyn, or the late entry into the debate of David Beckham – that is the referendum’s main story. In the last week or so, this problem has turned nuclear: the awful events in Birstall have made “hate” a ubiquitous trope, and the prospect of any real understanding of the national mood has receded even further.
Broadcast journalism has a lot to answer for here. Far too much political coverage has only one way of framing its subject: riding the battlebuses, fixating on the polls, and being so obsessed with each side’s supposed figureheads that the whole thing starts to look like gladiatorial sport (witness Tuesday’s utterly absurd debate in that well-known home of meaningful discourse, Wembley Arena). In turn, in the wider world, that feeds into a tendency to conflate parties and campaigns with the people who vote for them. The result: people who want out are perceived as being made from the same stuff as the nastier elements of the leave campaign, endlessly ready to be “whipped up” into a steaming rage, and therefore worthy of the same mixture of bafflement and contempt.
This then blurs out into the online voices that these days act as the media’s outer ring. On Twitter last weekend I had a brief exchange with someone who said that Nigel Farage’s unbelievably ugly “Breaking point” poster stunt amounted to “mass hysteria”, to which there was only one reply. No, it was just one man standing in front of a poster. The reality of the coalition of people voting leave is much more complex and confounding – “hysteria” is the kind of word that speaks of a huge set of misunderstandings.
But these misapprehensions run deep, not least on the political left. Even those who understand that something seismic is afoot among predominantly working-class voters are still too keen on the idea that they are gullible enough to be led over a cliff by people with whom they would actually disagree, if only they knew the facts. But most people are not really being “led” by anyone. In my experience, Farage, Boris Johnson and Michael Gove et al are viewed by most people with as much cynicism as the people fronting the remain campaign. Moreover, this argument is dangerously redolent of that lousy old Marxist trope of “false consciousness”, whereby people enthusiastically following the supposedly wrong cause are only a speech or poster away from enlightenment, and a sharp left turn.
We need to face up to two things. First, a lot of people want out of the EU because they are worried and angry about the consequences of the free movement of people, and in that sense they have made their choice rationally. Second, even if Farage, Johnson and Gove would doubtless use Brexit as an opportunity to further our journey towards an essentially sink-or-swim society, there are plenty of working-class voters who would probably go along with that.
I don’t write either of those things with any relish – I’m a remain voter who loathes modern Conservatism. But if my side of politics is even going to begin to revive itself, bracing thoughts like those are surely going to be obligatory.
Labour lost Scotland over the last decade, thanks partly to the very same mess of inequality, voicelessness, professionalised politics and dysfunctional economics that is now tearing England and Wales in two (or even three, or four). Thanks to a nationalism that was social-democratic and civic, politics was aligned in a generally progressive direction. The Scots’ political reformation underlined the sense that neoliberalism doesn’t work.
But what is now happening elsewhere in the UK underlines a tangle of other stuff – to do with culture, belonging and community – that is going to require a completely different level of response.
Even if the remain side wins, it will not say anything much about the essential condition of the country, aside from underlining how divided we are. So please: in that event, no crowing about a resounding triumph, or delusional thinking about a country miraculously restored by the weekend to a state of political harmony. We are in a terrible mess, and it is probably going to take decades to even begin to put things right.
The UK is now two nations, staring across a political chasm
What a strange, unsettling, anxious moment this is. I mean that partly in the sense of vote, but also of the emotions that are still raw after the death of Jo Cox, and what the last month or so has highlighted about the state of what we must still call the United Kingdom. Many people knew the rough story, of course: of a country cleaved by rising inequality, prone to great outbursts of anger and frustration, and now in the midst of its own version of US-style culture wars – a picture, in fact, that now applies to much of Europe, and is coming into even sharper focus in America itself. But if the build-up to the referendum has told us anything, it is that all this has reached a disturbing peak.
On Tuesday I was in Northampton’s market square, and finding leave voters was a cinch. One or two, just to make this clear, were plain racist, but the majority were not: they talked about immigration, but in the context of jobs, housing and all the rest. An hour later I was on a London tube train sprinkled with successful-looking professionals, a few of whom had “Stronger in” stickers on their Herschel rucksacks and laptop bags. They would presumably echo the views of leave voters that a young woman about to go to university had expressed in Northampton. She talked about their supposed view of immigrants: “They think they’re stealing our jobs … bringing in crime and terrorism. It’s just nonsense.”
Two nations, in short, are staring at each other across a political chasm. To make things worse, while the rightwing press have been up to their usual disgraceful tricks, the parts of the media that might offer a counterbalance have mostly failed to understand that it is the restive mood of millions of people – not David Cameron or Jeremy Corbyn, or the late entry into the debate of David Beckham – that is the referendum’s main story. In the last week or so, this problem has turned nuclear: the awful events in Birstall have made “hate” a ubiquitous trope, and the prospect of any real understanding of the national mood has receded even further.
Broadcast journalism has a lot to answer for here. Far too much political coverage has only one way of framing its subject: riding the battlebuses, fixating on the polls, and being so obsessed with each side’s supposed figureheads that the whole thing starts to look like gladiatorial sport (witness Tuesday’s utterly absurd debate in that well-known home of meaningful discourse, Wembley Arena). In turn, in the wider world, that feeds into a tendency to conflate parties and campaigns with the people who vote for them. The result: people who want out are perceived as being made from the same stuff as the nastier elements of the leave campaign, endlessly ready to be “whipped up” into a steaming rage, and therefore worthy of the same mixture of bafflement and contempt.
This then blurs out into the online voices that these days act as the media’s outer ring. On Twitter last weekend I had a brief exchange with someone who said that Nigel Farage’s unbelievably ugly “Breaking point” poster stunt amounted to “mass hysteria”, to which there was only one reply. No, it was just one man standing in front of a poster. The reality of the coalition of people voting leave is much more complex and confounding – “hysteria” is the kind of word that speaks of a huge set of misunderstandings.
But these misapprehensions run deep, not least on the political left. Even those who understand that something seismic is afoot among predominantly working-class voters are still too keen on the idea that they are gullible enough to be led over a cliff by people with whom they would actually disagree, if only they knew the facts. But most people are not really being “led” by anyone. In my experience, Farage, Boris Johnson and Michael Gove et al are viewed by most people with as much cynicism as the people fronting the remain campaign. Moreover, this argument is dangerously redolent of that lousy old Marxist trope of “false consciousness”, whereby people enthusiastically following the supposedly wrong cause are only a speech or poster away from enlightenment, and a sharp left turn.
We need to face up to two things. First, a lot of people want out of the EU because they are worried and angry about the consequences of the free movement of people, and in that sense they have made their choice rationally. Second, even if Farage, Johnson and Gove would doubtless use Brexit as an opportunity to further our journey towards an essentially sink-or-swim society, there are plenty of working-class voters who would probably go along with that.
I don’t write either of those things with any relish – I’m a remain voter who loathes modern Conservatism. But if my side of politics is even going to begin to revive itself, bracing thoughts like those are surely going to be obligatory.
Labour lost Scotland over the last decade, thanks partly to the very same mess of inequality, voicelessness, professionalised politics and dysfunctional economics that is now tearing England and Wales in two (or even three, or four). Thanks to a nationalism that was social-democratic and civic, politics was aligned in a generally progressive direction. The Scots’ political reformation underlined the sense that neoliberalism doesn’t work.
But what is now happening elsewhere in the UK underlines a tangle of other stuff – to do with culture, belonging and community – that is going to require a completely different level of response.
Even if the remain side wins, it will not say anything much about the essential condition of the country, aside from underlining how divided we are. So please: in that event, no crowing about a resounding triumph, or delusional thinking about a country miraculously restored by the weekend to a state of political harmony. We are in a terrible mess, and it is probably going to take decades to even begin to put things right.
- Apr 13, 2015
- 3,868
Firstly it will be very close.... secondly the Scottish referendum hasn't caused widespread unhappiness as all the doom mongers said would happen..... so chill.. tomorrow we move on whatever the result.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,274
Saw a programme a while back and showed families that had fallen out over in/out and were still not speaking to each other, plus the decision in Scotland was very close, those wanting out of the union still want out and won't let it lie.
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
It is very worrying the way the far-right have been galvanised by the referendum. Whichever way the result goes, I also fear they won't crawl back under the stone they came from.
Indeed. A very real worry.
nicko31
Well-known member
Was just in my local town and was canvassed by the IN crowd. I told them I had already voted IN, some woman then ran up to me and started shouting abuse. Bit taken back by the HATE in her eyes
But they will.
Gabbafella
Well-known member
- Aug 22, 2012
- 4,907
I don't give a toss about it now, I very much doubt I'll care in a few days time.
- Apr 13, 2015
- 3,868
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
I think Cameron must be sick of it all.
All the stress if his negotiating in Europe, followed by being called a liar pretty much everyday.
Even if remain wins he'll be off by Christmas I suspect.
A Remain vote, AND a Cameron resignation, would be pretty bloody magnificent.
Big win.
- Apr 13, 2015
- 3,868
"Far right".... it's almost obligatory for this label to be thrown at anybody who doesn't agree with the left.... what happened to the mid or near right,.. or simply just the right?..... or do you lot see anybody who doesn't vote Labour as a racist?.... just asking.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
By far right I was specifically referring to just that. The EDL/Britain First/BNP element. They are not representative of the 'leave' campaign as a whole, but they're there and have become far more vocal, visible and in their eyes at least, acceptable as a result of this referendum. For what it's worth, although I have voted 'remain', I am not a Labour voter.
willyfantastic
New member
- Mar 1, 2009
- 2,368
there was more abuse over the Shrimp vs Honey Badger was't there?