You want me to feel shame in reacting appropriately to your bigoted stance - one which has him condemned on little or no evidence because 'he's Libyan, he's a refugee, he's a devout Muslim, he went to Pakistan' - none of which, singularly or collectively gives any indication that he promotes or glorifies mass murder? Right-o.
You offer no evidence that states he is a terrorist, has been involved in any aspect of terrorism or has terrorist sympathies - none. You merely state circumstancial evidence - quoted to fit a 'profile' of what constitutes a terrorist.
You're not even right to say he was picked up by the intelligence services, and that's the ONLY thing you can quote to makes you suspicious of him - unless you really are basing guilt on the 'he's Libyan...' etc stuff. I am assuming that it has crossed your mind that maybe - just maybe - the Americans got this one wrong?
Why you feel it is bigoted ( thank you for dropping the 'white' bit by the way !! ) to have a genuine opinion that I am not convinced by you having him deemed totally innocent although you have no evidence other than your own 'is it bigoted' view to the contrary.
If we are to have a serious discussion on security and the threat of Terrorism and on Omars likely release and any perceived injustice, then it is only fair to discuss some of his profiling and actions.
Even scratching the surface since this thread started some days ago it has become clear to me and others that there might be an increased likelihood of an attachment to some level of Islamic Extreminism than was first mentioned.
Now because of this I am NOT willing to join any celebration party on his release, as I feel that the violence such views preach is extremely abhorrent.
Now it might be that he has been the victim of an injustice, but today neither one of us can say for sure.
then t is relevant when looking for Islamic Terrorists that the individual has certain profiling and I say again I am as yet not