cjd
Well-known member
The investigation is to establish what contract he was subject to at the time and what the provisions are under that for punishing what he did, and whether if he wasn't under contract what ECB measures he would be subjected to. That's what the investigation is covering.
How absolutely pathetic.
So, it's now down to all the legal stuff, rather than the fact he was a teenager, who made a bad judgement of error 10 years ago.
Pathetic....truly pathetic.