Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
Signal still not ****ing fixed. Delays AGAIN.
And the prize for Britain’s worst train goes to …
So, how late was your train? The 07.29 Brighton to London Victoria service has made headlines as the worst in Britain, after failing to roll in at its scheduled time of 8.35am on a single occasion in the last year. It may be little consolation to those trundling slowly through Sussex to know their train may not be the absolute worst: neither Network Rail, the Department for Transport or the rail regulator have those figures to hand. It was left to angry commuters to ask train operator Southern to research and confirm the suspicion that this service never ran to schedule.
According to the official standard, though, the 07.29 slowcoach was only late 73% of the time. That is because punctuality, for commuter services, is officially defined as up to 4 minutes and 59 seconds behind time. Compensation is normally only paid for delays six times the lateness threshold.
Rebecca Francis, 37, aboard the 07:29, said she failed to reach work in Marylebone on time for the past three months: “It’s at least 10 minutes late on a daily basis. Between October and December, I had to apply for delay compensation at least five times for this train.” Southern’s stats show the train gets in less than 10 minutes late most of the time – 71% of trains last year – so only a small part of the annual season ticket cost (more than £4,000 since the January fare rise) can be clawed back.
Southern thinks, but can’t confirm, that the 07.29 is the only one of its services never to arrive to the minute. The following and preceding Brighton-Victoria trains actually did meet their schedule on occasion, albeit on only 1% and 2% of their attempts – although the poor 07.44 presumably stood little chance of overtaking its predecessor. Southern admits the stats are “not brilliant” but says the line is one of the most congested routes in the country and the knock-on effects of delays can be enormous.
Two years ago, then transport minister Norman Baker infuriated some train operators by trying to make the so-called “right-time” – punctuality as it appears on commuters’ watches, expectations and real-life plans – the default measure of lateness, rather than the five- or 10-minute relaxed “public performance measure”, the yardstick on which reputation and commercial franchises are judged. At time of writing, a mere 44% of Southern trains between Victoria and Brighton had run late on Tuesday by the official count. The truth can only make us angrier.
really are cuntbags.
And I guarantee the London Bridge services BEFORE any works are just as bad.
Ever since they tried to amalgamate the Gatwick Express and the normal Brighton main line peak services it has been chaos, it was pointed out at the time that having crew changeovers at Gatwick smack bang in the middle of rush hours was a recipe for disaster but the profit merchants won thus now you have reaped what was sown.
Hassocks serves Hurstpierpoint, Ditchling, Sayers Common, Albourne, Woodmancote, Henfield, and for those people who need a car park (i.e. Preston Park won't do), northern Brighton. Southern Rail have admitted as such, having just spent a huge amount of money updating the station facilities, and now the services have been slashed.
I had a bit of a rant about this on Twitter yesterday and a driver of the London/Brighton route replied to me. I included it for balance (note, language NSFW) : https://storify.com/stephencgrant/london-to-brighton-train-rant
And the prize for Britain’s worst train goes to …
So, how late was your train? The 07.29 Brighton to London Victoria service has made headlines as the worst in Britain, after failing to roll in at its scheduled time of 8.35am on a single occasion in the last year. It may be little consolation to those trundling slowly through Sussex to know their train may not be the absolute worst: neither Network Rail, the Department for Transport or the rail regulator have those figures to hand. It was left to angry commuters to ask train operator Southern to research and confirm the suspicion that this service never ran to schedule.
According to the official standard, though, the 07.29 slowcoach was only late 73% of the time. That is because punctuality, for commuter services, is officially defined as up to 4 minutes and 59 seconds behind time. Compensation is normally only paid for delays six times the lateness threshold.
Rebecca Francis, 37, aboard the 07:29, said she failed to reach work in Marylebone on time for the past three months: “It’s at least 10 minutes late on a daily basis. Between October and December, I had to apply for delay compensation at least five times for this train.” Southern’s stats show the train gets in less than 10 minutes late most of the time – 71% of trains last year – so only a small part of the annual season ticket cost (more than £4,000 since the January fare rise) can be clawed back.
Southern thinks, but can’t confirm, that the 07.29 is the only one of its services never to arrive to the minute. The following and preceding Brighton-Victoria trains actually did meet their schedule on occasion, albeit on only 1% and 2% of their attempts – although the poor 07.44 presumably stood little chance of overtaking its predecessor. Southern admits the stats are “not brilliant” but says the line is one of the most congested routes in the country and the knock-on effects of delays can be enormous.
Two years ago, then transport minister Norman Baker infuriated some train operators by trying to make the so-called “right-time” – punctuality as it appears on commuters’ watches, expectations and real-life plans – the default measure of lateness, rather than the five- or 10-minute relaxed “public performance measure”, the yardstick on which reputation and commercial franchises are judged. At time of writing, a mere 44% of Southern trains between Victoria and Brighton had run late on Tuesday by the official count. The truth can only make us angrier.
Another uckfield one cancelled this morning.
Well this bodes well...
[tweet]555650390273048576[/tweet]
Why on earth can't they just invest in a robust signalling system as a priority rather than tarting up stations? OK, it's nice to have station facilities fit for the 21st century, but signal failure cause stupid amounts of delays and subsequent compensation claims. Seems like a no-brainer.
They are. New signals have gone in recently on the Seaford and Arun Valley routes and the new Lewes to Hastings signalling goes live next month (keep well clear!). Many of the London to Brighton signals have now been replaced. The problem at the moment is the London Bridge shambles is affecting everything else plus all the usual issues. I have, however, not known it as consistently bad as it is now for a long time. Ultimately though there are too many people wanting to use a railway that is too congested and until someone can come up with a viable second mainline (which is unlikely) everything else (loads of new trains, major timetable changes next December, the full Thameslink opening in a few years, new signals etc) is going to be nothing more than a sticking plaster.
And how late is that? Railtrack were promising to switch it on months ago. Will they keep the latest promise?... the new Lewes to Hastings signalling goes live next month ...
And how late is that? Railtrack were promising to switch it on months ago. Will they keep the latest promise?
Before the railwaymen get on my back and say I clearly don't know how difficult it is to run a railway, I am not blaming the drivers, signalmen, etc, but the utterly hopeless management. However, operations-wise, it seems to me that Southern have given up trying to run services on time. Before Christmas they had dispatch staff hurrying on anyone who was running for the train, to ensure the doors closed at least 30 seconds before departure. Now it seems they aren't bothering. And they've gone and combined the franchise with Great Northern and Thameslink and handled the whole lot to GoVia and, IIRC, turned down Abellio, who are doing a very good job on a limited timescale with Greater Anglia. Whereas the DfT could strip Southern of its franchise, it must surely be far more difficult to disentangle the whole TSGN operation. And before anyone suggests nationalising the railways again, Network Rail is now a public company, and they're doing a great job, aren't they?