Must have been a pretty high standard at the Brighton 10k today. Some well known Brighton names came in down the order including Graham’s Godden down in 65th. The finish must have been great to watch - several runners within second of each other.
Cracking effort, you've clearly got a sub-38:30 in there somewhere!
Cheers. I’d like to think so. In hindsight the frustration is that when conditions were absolutely perfect 4 weeks ago I completely blew it by going off, far too fast.
I think the pressure of knowing conditions were perfect played a part as my first thought was take full advantage of this, as you rarely get everything in your favour.
A bit like a spinner on a 5th day pitch you lose your patience and keep trying to bowl the perfect ball each delivery, with no long term plan. By contrast today I bowled a couple of tidy maidens in my opening spell and built up a rhythm.
Going back to the annual mileage, I thought of an interesting (or possibly not) addition, while pounding the SDW yesterday morning. How many of your miles are racing ones. Mine's 144.1 – pretty light for me, with only one non-marathon event.
Going back to the annual mileage, I thought of an interesting (or possibly not) addition, while pounding the SDW yesterday morning. How many of your miles are racing ones. Mine's 144.1 – pretty light for me, with only one non-marathon event.
Yep. My coach is very clear on this....'A' races need to be spread out, and have dedicated plans aimed at them. You might occasionally get a great parkrun in when not expecting it but chasing PBs all the time is a potential recipe for disaster, particularly with longer distances and us oldies (going eyeballs out at parkrun is ironically OK for most as the recovery time is so short).Here's a bit of a thought, related to the idea of over-training: over-competing. For example, loads of people now run weekly parkruns; I guess the figures on this would be unbelievable compared with a couple of decades or so when despite the running boom, there were fewer of us doing it than these days. This is a good thing, of course.
But I wonder if weekly runs - which for many of us means trying to beat your PB every 7 days - is a sensible strategy. It could mean for some 50 or so weeks of trying to operate flat out and goes against the traditional ideas of peaking and (even more importantly) resting. I've fallen for this - you get into the mindset of:
a) if you are doing well, then pushing yourself for the shaving a few seconds which will deliver the PB/SB or
b) if you are doing badly, desperately trying to catch-up with where you were or thought you should be (this is worse as you get older because you tend to think that you will never get it back)
The hamster on his wheel springs to mind. Like many sports it's in the head as much as in the legs.
130.2 out of 1006.
10 Park Runs and 12 other races.
Two more to go which will get me up to 149.2
Well, if Parkruns count, I make mine 187.4m so far this year (35 Parkruns, two half marathons and a marathon).
130.2 out of 1006.
10 Park Runs and 12 other races.
Two more to go which will get me up to 149.2
Well, if Parkruns count, I make mine 187.4m so far this year (35 Parkruns, two half marathons and a marathon).
Here's a bit of a thought, related to the idea of over-training: over-competing. For example, loads of people now run weekly parkruns; I guess the figures on this would be unbelievable compared with a couple of decades or so when despite the running boom, there were fewer of us doing it than these days. This is a good thing, of course.
But I wonder if weekly runs - which for many of us means trying to beat your PB every 7 days - is a sensible strategy. It could mean for some 50 or so weeks of trying to operate flat out and goes against the traditional ideas of peaking and (even more importantly) resting. I've fallen for this - you get into the mindset of:
a) if you are doing well, then pushing yourself for the shaving a few seconds which will deliver the PB/SB or
b) if you are doing badly, desperately trying to catch-up with where you were or thought you should be (this is worse as you get older because you tend to think that you will never get it back)
The hamster on his wheel springs to mind. Like many sports it's in the head as much as in the legs.
Here's a bit of a thought, related to the idea of over-training: over-competing. For example, loads of people now run weekly parkruns; I guess the figures on this would be unbelievable compared with a couple of decades or so when despite the running boom, there were fewer of us doing it than these days. This is a good thing, of course.
But I wonder if weekly runs - which for many of us means trying to beat your PB every 7 days - is a sensible strategy. It could mean for some 50 or so weeks of trying to operate flat out and goes against the traditional ideas of peaking and (even more importantly) resting. I've fallen for this - you get into the mindset of:
a) if you are doing well, then pushing yourself for the shaving a few seconds which will deliver the PB/SB or
b) if you are doing badly, desperately trying to catch-up with where you were or thought you should be (this is worse as you get older because you tend to think that you will never get it back)
The hamster on his wheel springs to mind. Like many sports it's in the head as much as in the legs.
Well, if Parkruns count, I make mine 187.4m so far this year (35 Parkruns, two half marathons and a marathon).
Thank you for saving me having to post that.Getting all pedantic (and I know Mrs [MENTION=26634]Simgull[/MENTION] would agree), parkrun isn't a race*- "There are no winners, just first finishers" or something like that...
Check out this loon!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46258278
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Check out this loon!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46258278
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Check out this loon!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46258278
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk