https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/...betting-in-soccer-but-not-for-the-lizard.html
I saw that Joey Bartons solicitor has re-tweeted this article...
I saw that Joey Bartons solicitor has re-tweeted this article...
Hmmm. Well that's one way of looking at it. One could also argue that the Americans are a bit more principled than we are when it comes to gambling and sport. I'm not necessarily making that argument - but if I were I don't expect it would find too many supporters on here seeing as how we always feel we're morally superior to America in every respect.Good to read a new slant on the Albion - in the NY Times no less.
Although that'll be more to do with American sport realising it's cutting it's nose off to spite it's face where gambling is concerned.
I still can't see private man Tony being all that comfortable with him and Star Lizard in the public eye.
Thought it was weird that Bloom wasn't listed as a director of Star Lizard, and he gave another one of his companies a £30 mill interest free loan.
A generous businessman.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/...betting-in-soccer-but-not-for-the-lizard.html
I saw that Joey Bartons solicitor has re-tweeted this article...
Hmmm. Well that's one way of looking at it. One could also argue that the Americans are a bit more principled than we are when it comes to gambling and sport. I'm not necessarily making that argument - but if I were I don't expect it would find too many supporters on here seeing as how we always feel we're morally superior to America in every respect.
Nice read........A generous businessman.
I cannot see what relevance this is to Joey Bartons solicitors as there are rules for players and a different set of rules for owners and he violated the ones for players.
I cannot see what relevance this is to Joey Bartons solicitors as there are rules for players and a different set of rules for owners and he violated the ones for players.
Legally - 100% correct. Bloom (and Coates at Stoke, etc) have broken no rules, whereas Barton did (over 1,000 times) and has earned his punishment.
More generally though, you can have some sympathy with his view that football's house is not entirely in order regards their relationship with the gambling industry.
Another media source thinking that Tony has made all his money from one source. What about his property development arm?
what property development arm? is there a record of his companies and investment? trouble with our Tony's secrecy is no a lot of public information, wasn't long ago that his entire wealth was based on the the betting web site he sold.
Nice read, and it shows how the Americans and the English view ownership and gambling companies.
There it's not permitted to own a club if your involved in gambling, whereas here it's deemed ok if you follow the leagues secret rules.
Thought it was weird that Bloom wasn't listed as a director of Star Lizard, and he gave another one of his companies a £30 mill interest free loan.
A very successful and wealthy businessman .
Barrister not solicitor..