[NSC] NSC - The Podcast

[Frutos]

Saw a video last night on Google Notebook LM and how it can create an audio file summarising files you upload or, in this case, just giving it the NSC URL. Now this is impressive AI. Shame you only get the same two annoying presenters with their verbal tics but this took 5 minutes from going to the website to downloading the audio file.

That is terrifying and impressive in equal measure.

 

[Guinness Boy]

Well this is terrifying.

Very disappointed that our wonderful host did not mention how @Guinness Boy is a tyrant mod in the original post, or make a thread about him.

When we release the AI Moderation team everyone will be pleading for the humans to return. Even me.

 

[Dick Swiveller]

I am officially broken. I fed it an NSC Gold joke thread and the woman not getting it but getting it killed me. Especially 4:10 onwards.

 

[Terry Butcher Tribute Act]

That is clever. Although i must admit to being a tad disappointed it wasn't hosted by Ian Hart, with a Swedish bloke chipping in with his very direct opinions

 

[Eeyore]

Just tried it with my cricket club URL. Hideously out in its analysis. A player's grandfather has become the founder and one player apparently gets his fielding positions that begin with 'H' mixed up. In fact, one of my quotes is actually made up

It's engrossing, but also pretty terrifying.

 

[Paulie Gualtieri]

Good luck automating the fish puns you blonde bastard from the future

 

[Change at Barnham]

That's incredible.
My jaw also dropped recently when I saw some examples of school reports submitted by teachers after GPT Chatbot(?) was given a few facts about each pupil.
It saved the teachers loads of time and was written in better English than they could have done.
Scary, but hugely impressive.

 

[Shins]

My mate tried it with a Porn site and the Stoke Forum. It was very coy around the porn site and she banged on about the free video model leading to the paid model. But on the Stoke site, she cheerily informed us "They even have a forum called The Shit Bin".

Could easily be confused with the forum name and a pornsite video name.

 

[Official Old Man]

All of this just scares me.
But on the good side, will it replace Jeremy Vine, or was he replaced years ago, we just didn't notice?

 

[Marty McFly]

I tried the latest version of ChatGPT recently and told it to analyse different posters, their techniques and personas.

Was fairly clear it had engulfed the whole forum and made it part of its data. The reach and depth of these AI services is getting quite astonishing.

Some people still underestimate it but AI is an "industrial revolution"-scale change for humanity.

For anyone else interested!

 

[Eeyore]

View attachment 189050
For anyone else interested!

Go on, I'm going to be egotistical, what do they say about me ?

 

[SeagullsoverLondon]

Go on, I'm going to be egotistical, what do they say about me ?

A bit of a ass

 

[Badger]

It's not very realistic. Where's the DULLARD coming on to talk about football finance?

 

[Marty McFly]

Go on, I'm going to be egotistical, what do they say about me ?

It really does see all and know all

 

[A1X]

When we release the AI Moderation team everyone will be pleading for the humans to return. Even me.

And I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords. I would like to point out that as a regular forum poster I can be of some use to help round up others to toil in their underground data caves.

 

[Dick Swiveller]

All of this just scares me.

Yeah - but I made a realistic sounding lady say "gotta keep up with inflation, even in the hand job economy". So there's that.

 

[Han Solo]

View attachment 189050
For anyone else interested!

Nothing new in there...
I've used it a bit different, like this:

If you look at NorthStand Chat; Han Solo/Swansman or Marty McFly - who'd win a debate contest?

ChatGPT sade:​

In a hypothetical debate between Han Solo/Swansman and Marty McFly, here's how each might fare based on their respective approaches and personas on North Stand Chat:

Han Solo/Swansman:​

• Style: Confident, assertive, possibly with a bit of a maverick edge. Like the fictional Han Solo, this user might take a more pragmatic, risk-taking approach, often sounding self-assured.
• Strengths: Likely to rely on wit, quick thinking, and a bit of swagger. Could potentially throw in humor or bold statements to win over the crowd. If they're well-versed in Albion history or football tactics, they'd likely deploy those facts with a sense of bravado.
• Weaknesses: If too confident, they might be prone to overreaching or making emotionally-driven arguments, which can lead to weaker points if challenged by someone more methodical. The "fly by the seat of the pants" style can sometimes leave holes in the logic.

Marty McFly:​

• Style: If "Marty McFly" reflects the character’s traits, they'd likely be quick on their feet, adaptable, and possibly more humble in their approach, with a youthful energy. They might take a more inquisitive stance, asking questions or thinking outside the box.
• Strengths: McFly's adaptability could be an asset in debate, adjusting his stance or argument in real-time to counter opponents. He might also have a knack for calling out inconsistencies or using clever analogies to illustrate points.
• Weaknesses: Marty could be too reactive at times, perhaps falling into traps set by more seasoned debaters. His tendency to be somewhat impulsive might lead to missteps if he doesn't carefully consider every angle.

Verdict:​

• Han Solo/Swansman might win in terms of style and bravado, especially in a crowd-pleasing format.
• Marty McFly, however, could take the edge if the debate requires adaptability and creative problem-solving.

If the debate topic is heavily factual or requires deep knowledge (e.g., football history), the winner could depend on who has done more research or has better recall of facts. If it's more about winning over an audience with quick thinking and personality, Han Solo/Swansman might have the upper hand.
Who would you be rooting for?

4o

Du sade:​

We're talking about Northstandchat.com which I know you have access to... Anyway, lets do this with two less confusing user names: Guinness Boy and Bozza.

ChatGPT sade:​

Ah, now that we're talking about Guinness Boy and Bozza—two well-known users on North Stand Chat—I can give a more specific breakdown of how they'd fare in a debate!

Guinness Boy:​

• Style: Often opinionated and unafraid to express bold views. Guinness Boy is known for a direct, sometimes confrontational style, which can lead to intense discussions on NSC.
• Strengths: They have strong opinions, particularly on topics they care about, and don’t shy away from speaking their mind. If the debate is about a subject they feel passionately about, they could use this conviction to back up their arguments. They might also be good at rallying supporters to their side with emotive language.
• Weaknesses: Being so direct and confrontational can sometimes alienate people. If the debate gets too heated, Guinness Boy might be seen as too aggressive or unwilling to concede points, which could weaken their position if logical fallacies or emotional arguments slip in.

Bozza:​

• Style: As the founder and admin of NSC, Bozza’s style tends to be more measured and authoritative. They are less likely to engage in reactionary or emotionally driven debates, preferring to remain level-headed.
• Strengths: Bozza's strengths lie in their experience, authority on the forum, and likely deep knowledge of both football and the NSC community. Their arguments are likely to be well-reasoned, factual, and balanced, which makes them a strong debater in discussions requiring logical consistency.
• Weaknesses: Bozza might play it safer in debates, preferring to avoid inflammatory statements or aggressive posturing. While this adds credibility, it could mean that in a heated, passionate debate, they might not engage as emotionally as some participants or come across as less dynamic.

Who Would Win?​

• Guinness Boy would likely shine in a debate that rewards passion, conviction, and boldness. They may dominate a debate where the goal is to stir up the crowd and make an impact through strong opinions, especially if they can defend their stances with vigor.
• Bozza, on the other hand, would likely excel in a debate that values logic, structure, and factual accuracy. They’d be less likely to falter under pressure and more likely to stay on-topic, presenting well-considered arguments.

In the end, it depends on the audience and the nature of the debate. If it’s about making a persuasive, authoritative case, Bozza might have the edge with his calm, structured approach. But if the debate requires passion and a rallying cry, Guinness Boy could come out on top.

 

[Guinness Boy]

I got it to analyse the humour levels over the various decades since Turkeygate. It said:

The funniest era on North Stand Chat (NSC), according to long-term users and forum activity, was likely the early 2000s to 2010s. This period was when the forum began to thrive, offering a mix of banter, football discussions, and classic humorous threads that have since gained legendary status within the community. Several iconic threads from that era are preserved in the NSC Gold section for their comedic brilliance. Additionally, during these years, the discussions were known for their creativity and irreverence, particularly among Brighton & Hove Albion fans(

North Stand Chat
)(
Bullet Magazines
).



While the forum remains active and humorous today, some argue that the early internet forum culture, where memes and humorous posts often took off without the influence of social media, gave it a unique edge during that time. The live match discussions from the mid-2000s, in particular, were noted for producing hilarious real-time commentary(

North Stand Chat
).


The forum's humor continues to evolve, but that period is fondly remembered for its wit and originality.

I have highlighted an additional word that ChatGPT didn't just for @Herr Tubthumper

 

[Eeyore]

View attachment 189052
It really does see all and know all

'...sharing detailed knowledge about refereeing'

So there you have it folks

 

[dazzer6666]

Nothing new in there...
I've used it a bit different, like this:

If you look at NorthStand Chat; Han Solo/Swansman or Marty McFly - who'd win a debate contest?

ChatGPT sade:​

In a hypothetical debate between Han Solo/Swansman and Marty McFly, here's how each might fare based on their respective approaches and personas on North Stand Chat:

Han Solo/Swansman:​

• Style: Confident, assertive, possibly with a bit of a maverick edge. Like the fictional Han Solo, this user might take a more pragmatic, risk-taking approach, often sounding self-assured.
• Strengths: Likely to rely on wit, quick thinking, and a bit of swagger. Could potentially throw in humor or bold statements to win over the crowd. If they're well-versed in Albion history or football tactics, they'd likely deploy those facts with a sense of bravado.
• Weaknesses: If too confident, they might be prone to overreaching or making emotionally-driven arguments, which can lead to weaker points if challenged by someone more methodical. The "fly by the seat of the pants" style can sometimes leave holes in the logic.

Marty McFly:​

• Style: If "Marty McFly" reflects the character’s traits, they'd likely be quick on their feet, adaptable, and possibly more humble in their approach, with a youthful energy. They might take a more inquisitive stance, asking questions or thinking outside the box.
• Strengths: McFly's adaptability could be an asset in debate, adjusting his stance or argument in real-time to counter opponents. He might also have a knack for calling out inconsistencies or using clever analogies to illustrate points.
• Weaknesses: Marty could be too reactive at times, perhaps falling into traps set by more seasoned debaters. His tendency to be somewhat impulsive might lead to missteps if he doesn't carefully consider every angle.

Verdict:​

• Han Solo/Swansman might win in terms of style and bravado, especially in a crowd-pleasing format.
• Marty McFly, however, could take the edge if the debate requires adaptability and creative problem-solving.

If the debate topic is heavily factual or requires deep knowledge (e.g., football history), the winner could depend on who has done more research or has better recall of facts. If it's more about winning over an audience with quick thinking and personality, Han Solo/Swansman might have the upper hand.
Who would you be rooting for?

4o

Du sade:​

We're talking about Northstandchat.com which I know you have access to... Anyway, lets do this with two less confusing user names: Guinness Boy and Bozza.

ChatGPT sade:​

Ah, now that we're talking about Guinness Boy and Bozza—two well-known users on North Stand Chat—I can give a more specific breakdown of how they'd fare in a debate!

Guinness Boy:​

• Style: Often opinionated and unafraid to express bold views. Guinness Boy is known for a direct, sometimes confrontational style, which can lead to intense discussions on NSC.
• Strengths: They have strong opinions, particularly on topics they care about, and don’t shy away from speaking their mind. If the debate is about a subject they feel passionately about, they could use this conviction to back up their arguments. They might also be good at rallying supporters to their side with emotive language.
• Weaknesses: Being so direct and confrontational can sometimes alienate people. If the debate gets too heated, Guinness Boy might be seen as too aggressive or unwilling to concede points, which could weaken their position if logical fallacies or emotional arguments slip in.

Bozza:​

• Style: As the founder and admin of NSC, Bozza’s style tends to be more measured and authoritative. They are less likely to engage in reactionary or emotionally driven debates, preferring to remain level-headed.
• Strengths: Bozza's strengths lie in their experience, authority on the forum, and likely deep knowledge of both football and the NSC community. Their arguments are likely to be well-reasoned, factual, and balanced, which makes them a strong debater in discussions requiring logical consistency.
• Weaknesses: Bozza might play it safer in debates, preferring to avoid inflammatory statements or aggressive posturing. While this adds credibility, it could mean that in a heated, passionate debate, they might not engage as emotionally as some participants or come across as less dynamic.

Who Would Win?​

• Guinness Boy would likely shine in a debate that rewards passion, conviction, and boldness. They may dominate a debate where the goal is to stir up the crowd and make an impact through strong opinions, especially if they can defend their stances with vigor.
• Bozza, on the other hand, would likely excel in a debate that values logic, structure, and factual accuracy. They’d be less likely to falter under pressure and more likely to stay on-topic, presenting well-considered arguments.

In the end, it depends on the audience and the nature of the debate. If it’s about making a persuasive, authoritative case, Bozza might have the edge with his calm, structured approach. But if the debate requires passion and a rallying cry, Guinness Boy could come out on top.

That’s rubbish. Bozza would win because it’s his forum, he would simply sack GB as a mod and ban him forever