You covered the whole event with NO TOP-UPS and fick people still asked.
The morons will just find something else to screw up.
In the meantime though, I changed my season by going all in V Southampton, and had an 'exciting' couple of months after that.
Seems odd to change the rules to accommodate those that can't/won't read the simple clear instructions.
(I know that's easy to say not being the person that has to deal with them)
I'm up for it, nice one Bozza! My feeling on the 50% rule is similar to Stat Brother's - you'll still get people either not realising and so effectively disqualifying themselves by going 'all in' anyway, and/or it'll be a right pain in the arse checking that people are not betting more. The simpler the rules, the better Shirley? Having the NO TOP-UPS rule plastered all over every week's thread and an instant ban for anyone asking for one should do it?!
Let people go all in, anyone asking for extra money after losing it all in 3 weeks can be given a weeks sabitical from NSC. They are no different to kids that used to blow their pocket money on the day they got it and were stuck reading the same copy of Whizzer and Chips for a week because they'd spent the rest on Sherbet Dip Dabs and Space Dust, I got told no then and its no now.
I'ml in please Bozza. I would be inclined to keep things simple - so no 50% rule and no top ups. Perhaps you should also make it clear from the outset that no correspondence will be entered into regarding the top up issue if someone goes "all-in" and loses?