Merged. Not sure why John left the need to post exactly the same again.
That's a lie of course. His Argus email address reveals why.
That's a lie of course. His Argus email address reveals why.
That, is just plain bollocks - there is no need to lie in order to justify a dislike for someone.
Naylor DOES report the successes.
He can be negative at times - but his job is to sell papers, not to follow the clubs line on everything.
Good call WW. Couldn't agree more. I like his stuff. He tells it as it is, which is his fcuking job.
He is a journalist not a fcuking cheerleader. I think a lot of the negative stuff written on here about AN is uncalled for.
If you have an Albion fan and not a Stoke fan or whatever reporting on the Albion you are not going to get balanced coverage. I can't ever remember seeing a typo in one of his pieces, never mind a factual error and generally I think the articles are well written.
Ends item
I was reading his report in the sports Argus and it occurred to me Naylor's big problem is he doesn't lie he just uses a lot of negative language, sometimes unnecessarily.
Andy - what do you feel you have to do to make it to the big time?
He's still got a job I'd give my left bollock to do.
.
I honestly don't think you would enjoy it on a 24/7 basis. Within days you would be confronted with the inevitable conflict between 'doing your journo job properly', and 'doing right by the club you support'. You'd either be pissing off your editor (fairly major), or Knight and large swathes of Brighton fans who are your mates (socially tricky).
Andy, how do you ask girls out?
He's still got a job I'd give my left bollock to do.
If anyone particularly wanted my left bollock that is. I'm not saying theres anything wrong with the other one.