Badger Boy
Mr Badger
- Jan 28, 2016
- 3,658
His cross for Ulloa's goal against Arsenal will take some beating for best cross at the Amex. Absolute perfection.
Sent from my HTC One M8s using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTC One M8s using Tapatalk
His cross for Ulloa's goal against Arsenal will take some beating for best cross at the Amex. Absolute perfection.
Sent from my HTC One M8s using Tapatalk
Great ball, but I'll raise you Pocognoli's for Knockaert's winner v Sheffield Wednesday.
He's pushed on since he left us. As already said - he's done a lot better than the likes of Bridcutt and Buckley.
But getting suspended for 8 games for tripping the ref in the middle of a promotion push is very likely to get fans upset.
Rose tinted specs from a few on here.
Was that before or after his '3 points for a cup win' comment? Or his kicking the referee up in the air when we were desperately short of strikers?
He was booed, but so what? Diddums... he was great for us in league 1, average for us in the Championship, and no big miss... we've hardly struggled without him, have we?
FFS the romancing of his average contribution to our cause on here makes me sick...
Most people were prepared to believe the referee's version because of Ashley's petulance. [MENTION=31]El Presidente[/MENTION] and I were at Wigan, where we couldn't see why he'd been sent off. Watching the video of it, it confirmed my theory that Barnes clipped the back of the referee's heel, which caused him to slightly stumble (not tripped) and the ref lost it. Barnes had been in his ear all game, because he had been denied a penalty from all in wrestling in our penalty area, the defender having had his arm around his neck at one point, and pushing him down to the ground. It happened right in front of me. I did say 'don't keep pushing it, Barnesy'. It was not a deliberate trip.
I was at the kit sponsor's dinner a couple of weeks later and spoke to him about it. He was upset the club wouldn't allow him to defend himself, at the hearing, as the club feared the ban would be extended.
I wasn't at that game and you are better qualified than me to judge on whether it was deliberate or not.
All I would say is that 8 game bans are not given out lightly and the club were clearly worried enough to let it lie. I would be upset at not being allowed to defend myself as well - but it doesn't mean he didn't do it.
Anyway respect to Dyche for seeing something in him and Barnes for taking his opportunity.
We've all moved on for the better.
Most people were prepared to believe the referee's version because of Ashley's petulance. [MENTION=31]El Presidente[/MENTION] and I were at Wigan, where we couldn't see why he'd been sent off. Watching the video of it, it confirmed my theory that Barnes clipped the back of the referee's heel, which caused him to slightly stumble (not tripped) and the ref lost it. Barnes had been in his ear all game, because he had been denied a penalty from all in wrestling in our penalty area, the defender having had his arm around his neck at one point, and pushing him down to the ground. It happened right in front of me. I did say 'don't keep pushing it, Barnesy'. It was not a deliberate trip.
I was at the kit sponsor's dinner a couple of weeks later and spoke to him about it. He was upset the club wouldn't allow him to defend himself, at the hearing, as the club feared the ban would be extended.
I was at Bolton at the time, but agree that the referee was just trying to save face. In issues of this nature you are guilty until found innocent, and the club no doubt thought there was insufficient video evidence to have the charges reversed.
As for Ashley, I've taught a few courses at Turf Moor for UCFB, and he's a lovely bloke, well thought of by everyone on and off the pitch there.
Thrived at missing sitters?Ashley Barnes would have absolutely THRIVED on the level of service this season just gone at the Albion.
Which makes his goalscoring record even more abysmal,.... 73 in 350.... pah.
Thrived at missing sitters?
You're there playing it across the back and probing a way into midfield, but most of these teams have 6 players in there stopping you. So you go long, and if Barnes is the target he can get a free kick by the centre half barging him in the back (Barnes is a niggly *******, they hate playing against someone like him). Or he wins a free kick because there has been contact, but not enough to knock over a 3 year old girl like.
Thrived at missing sitters?
Dont remember quoting I blamed him for any defeat. Hemed will get more goals than Barnes in the PL if he gets the chance as he's a natural finisher, Barnes isn't more of a hit and hope type which reflects in his stats.So many of those "sitters" were half chances in a Poyet team that often didn't create many chances in the Championship.
Every forward does miss sitters but Barnes was not playing as a centre forward in a goal grabbing team, in fact he seldom played centre forward at all, more of a defensive wide player in Poyet's basically negative set up.
I lost count of the number of times people like you blamed him for a defeat and slagged him off because he missed the one half chance we had. I even had one chap in the pub blame him for our thrashing in the Cup at Liverpool
Dont remember quoting I blamed him for any defeat. Hemed will get more goals than Barnes in the PL if he gets the chance as he's a natural finisher, Barnes isn't more of a hit and hope type which reflects in his stats.
With rall due espect mate, you're coming across as more and more of a KNOB on the subject with every post you make on this thread.
Barnes and Murray are absolute masters of winning free kicks in an aerial challenge where there's been no contact. At times it is literally comical. Amazed refs can't see through it but I'm not complaining (I will be if Barnes does it to us next season mind)