Moshe Gariani
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2005
- 12,203
100 + (8 x 2) = 116Oh, it's a math thread
116 x 7 = 812
812 - 3 - 2 = 807
100 + (8 x 2) = 116Oh, it's a math thread
Bad Light saves us...
This is going to be a Long Season.
George will have been picked partly because he swings the ball and can take wickets.regardless of the surface. Very, very difficult though making a step up in class and clearly looks like the batters will be on top in this game.The last time we played Northampton there were lots of runs and very few wickets. Wantage ROAD was about right, Sounds like this is another belter - what a track for Garton to make his debut on
Are we already looking at very high scoring innings and a draw?
CLATTER of wickets this morning.Have we lost yet. Praying for rain as usual save our batters being humiliated
100 + (8 x 2) = 116
116 x 7 = 812
812 - 3 - 2 = 807
surely a bit easier (than bowling northants out) - 100 x 8 = 800, +7 = 807
(do you have to use all the numbers? if so: (100x8)+(7x(2+2-3))
and back to the cricket
Bad light? they don't seem to be having too much difficulty smashing the pies round the park... what a ridiculous decision to come off.
Bad light? they don't seem to be having too much difficulty smashing the pies round the park... what a ridiculous decision to come off.
In the last 3 overs, Briggs went for two boundaries, then Shahzad for 11 including a SIX, and a boundary 4 off the last ball of the Briggs over before they came off. RIDICULOUS
If it uses up time and helps us get a draw, even at this early stage rather than lose, who will complain
This uncontested toss stuff seems to have made all the difference then?