The examples I gave weren't changing the subject - they were illustrating how the Western media often provides unbalanced and biased reporting, in response to your first three questions.
In regards to your final one, I consider the BBC to be the most unbiased news corporation in the world - but even then from time to time I notice inaccurate and biased reporting. A recent example of that includes the reporting of the Syrian uprising (sorry, I Know you hate examples)
Ok, so you believe the BBC more than the NK equivalent, at least you admit that. So do you agree with this BBC story then that people starve and there are famines in NK?
BBC News - Charities warn of food shortages in North Korea
Do you then not question yourself as to how a country where people are forced to eat grass can then afford to have a nuclear weapons programme and can launch (well limp) a satellite into space?
PS On another point... I hate examples That is a bit rich, you have not once refered to the link I GAVE YOU of the North Korea NEWS READER reading the (the non news according to you) story. Which is the point of this thread. Stop talking about Syria (or any other country) we are talking about NK now and nothing else and your continuous protestations on behalf of the odious North Korean regime.