- Thread starter
- #61
If thats your rule, you really are going to some shit restaurants.
I was being tongue-in-cheek, but...what sort of restaurants do you go to? Ones where you can shout and swear at the waiters?
If thats your rule, you really are going to some shit restaurants.
Yes, the CHEFS are British but they don't just cook British food do they our chefs cook all kinds of cuisines because we don't have one! So far, the British cuisine has been summed up as fry ups and a Sunday roast. Are you saying that's all they cook? Dear me
So you're saying the opposite to Chappers, that the average British chef is to blame?
Not at all.
The 'average' British chef is largely to blame, yes.
But Chappers is right. There are plenty of British chefs who rank among the best in the world. The problem is there are some shit ones out there too, and those are the ones a lot of the people who can't afford to eat at Gordon Ramsey's will remember.
I've eaten at two of Gordon Ramsay's places and actually found them very disappointing.
I was being tongue-in-cheek, but...what sort of restaurants do you go to? Ones where you can shout and swear at the waiters?
So you're saying the opposite to Chappers, that the average British chef is to blame?
No. Becuase that would be the shity restaurants where you go.
Durum wheat from which pasta is made was probably introduced into Southern Italy by Arabs.
Not sure what argument that proves to be honest. I've been to some expensive shit French restaurents.
And pasta itself almost certainly developed from Chinese noodles, whether or not it was actually Marco Polo who introduced them into Italy, as the (possibly untrue) legend has it.
I don't think he cooked my meal.
So you can't really judge his cooking skills then...
If it's his name being used to sell the restaurant and he has employed the chef in his own image then yes, yes I can.
Bearing in mind you have little or no appreciation for British food, nor its history, what are you looking for when trying to be impressed?