You haven't a clue, it would take more like TEN years to replace all drivers if they could which they can't
You're being STUPID, stop it[emoji23]
You haven't a clue, it would take more like TEN years to replace all drivers if they could which they can't
It depends on what depot they are at, but a starter driver at Brighton who would drive Brighton to Ore , Brighton to Haywards Heath & Brighton to Littlehampton would take roughly 2 years from leaving the job centre to be able to do that fully passed out. Problem is that there are not enough Driver Instructors to ensure that can do their route learning and accompanied hours in the cab so may take a lot longer. It's the next step learning to London, Portsmouth/Southampton etc that is hard as they cannot learn the routes as nobody to cover their booked duties whilst they do so.
This has been going on for years, not a new thing. Simply not enough drivers to do what they have to do.
They've had 4 years to get the ball rolling and 2 years since the first emergency timetables due to staff shortages in Dec 2014. They didn't act then and won't act now.
Out of interest what's uptake like? If there's vacancies how many would typically apply and then pass?
You're being STUPID, stop it[emoji23]
I think his point is that there isn't an infinite amount of space on the tracks or driver instructors or other drivers to fill routes that would normally be covered by those doing advanced route training.
One driver may take 2 years to be fully qualified but to qualify a whole army of them isn't a case of all being done in 2 years. The critical path of 10 years, whilst dramatically extreme may not be far off
there's a voice of experienceit would be impossible to do, it's simply not feasible to train a completely new workforce. For a train driver at a depot like brighton to be fully qualified driving over every route plus each form of train would indeed be about 10 years after he started if not longer
Southern Failway have officially given up providing a rail service in Sussex tomorrow
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38290260
The thing is, I'm very much on the fence with regards the striking unions. I find it deeply worrying that the unions are getting slaughtered to an unfair degree when this train company were an absolute DISGRACE long before the strikes took affect. For example, my morning service was cancelled 14 times in 12 weeks this time last year. Nothing to do with the unions at all. Why isn't the company being held to account?
It would be impossible to do, it's simply not feasible to train a completely new workforce. For a train driver at a depot like Brighton to be fully qualified driving over every route plus each form of train would indeed be about 10 years after he started if not longer
seems technology should be used to solve that, using simulators to get the drivers learning the routes.
Very funny
you'll have to explain the humor. airlines and shipping (and plenty other industries) use simulators for training, why not rail? you'd still want real track experience, but you could cover dozens of hours of route familiaristion in a simulator.
Talk about something you know not about something you don't as it makes you look stupid.
...if you say they all do it by sim then I'll go with what you say.
Why don't you go back and read the rest of the threadi didn't. they use technology to supplement real world training. see this is maybe why the rail industry you seem to represent are stuck in the past, because you aren't open to new methods.
to be clearer, im not suggesting they replace all training with simulators, but using it for the route learning to cut the 10 years Ernest reckons it takes to learn the routes.