Gritt23
New member
Just to take your point a bit further Sten, there are rumblings (although don't get carried away, it won't happen, but is an interesting viewpoint) that the best way to reduce the brain injuries, and long-term degenerative injuries suffered would be to do away with helmets altogether. That way, players will learn to tackle in a more regulated way, and you won't see the likes of James Harrison (sorry to pick on him, everyone does) clattering into opponents in teh way he does, if he didn't have a helmet on.
The counter-argument given is always that you can't take the big hits out of the game, because that is so central to it.
Personally, I don't get this "NFL is soft" business from Rugby fans. Both are incredibly physical games, played by incredible physical specimens (more League than Union) but as far as pointing at another sport and saying "oy softee" why point at each other when we see footballers rolling around and screaming when someone brushes against their foot.
The counter-argument given is always that you can't take the big hits out of the game, because that is so central to it.
Personally, I don't get this "NFL is soft" business from Rugby fans. Both are incredibly physical games, played by incredible physical specimens (more League than Union) but as far as pointing at another sport and saying "oy softee" why point at each other when we see footballers rolling around and screaming when someone brushes against their foot.