As far as FFP is concerned they can lose £105m over three years, and by the calculations of a DULLARD had about £100m of FFP profits in their three most recent years, so plenty of wiggle room to spend more money, and that is before taking into account any unusually generous sponsorship deals. Even if the latter are outlawed, nothing to stop the club going on a pre-season tour of Saudi and being paid handsomely for the privilege.
Yeah, but what do you know?!
Given the sorts of fees & wages they'd need to pay and the quantity of players required (even with amortisation), it would hopefully put a bit of a dampener on their spending?
I'll leave you to shoot down my rudimentary calculations, but (before factoring in any extra income from inflated pre-season tour income and whatever else they can lay their hands on), wouldn't that £205m budget before FFP is breached 'only' stretch to 4 or 5 £50m players on £100k per week? i.e. £10m of the fee for each year (assuming a 5 year contract), plus £5m wages per year (c. £100k pw). So £15m per player per year over 3 years = £45m. 205/45 = roughly 4.5?
*awaits a schooling from the man who knows*