IndependentWSU
New member
- May 24, 2011
- 350
Brilliant....Are they all looking for the exit?
Its the family stand, well most of it,..... what do you expect, chavs in trackies and baseball caps giving it large across to the away fans...?...... horses for courses.I sat in the 1901 section of the East Lower for one game in our first season. A friend couldn't go so I blagged his ticket for the day, pulling rank on my son and giving him my NS ticket. I hated it!! Everytime I stood up getting a bit animated, I was getting stared at. I was expecting them to place their index fingers over lips and tell me to Shhhhhhhhhh.
Ideal stand for some people. Not for me I'm afraid.
Its the family stand, well most of it,..... what do you expect, chavs in trackies and baseball caps giving it large across to the away fans...?...... horses for courses.
Quite. I don't understand the jibes aimed at the east. It's bound to be quietest of all the stands for obvious reasons. However the atmosphere in the part I'm in is often very good. It was rocking for the QPR game. I'm guessing those moaning about it never went to the Goldstone or Withdean.
North stand noisiest and you will see more of the goals close up (as our ratio of goals in north to goals in south is ridiculous!)
What is the ratio of goals at either end?
I've just totted them up, and the stats for (league games only) THIS season are:
South goals: 9
North Goals: 16
However, rather than any mystical properties of the North being apparent, I think it's actually THIS stat which is the relevant one:
1st half goals: 7
2nd half goals: 18
i.e. Yes, we do score more in the North, because we almost always kick that way in the 2nd half.
No sure which is cause and which is effect. So...
do we score more in the north goal because we shoot that way in the second half?
..or..
do we score more goals in the second half because we are shooting at the north goal?
Some stato needs to split the results further by "direction of play" (hkfc - do you have this?). Do we consistently score more in the second half regardless of direction of play (thus making it a "second half" thing) or do we score more in the north goal regardless of half (making it a "North Stand" thing)? I always suspected it was the latter because Gus was so keen to change the seating layout so that we had home fans behind both goals.
South Stand goals: 1st half 6 / 2nd half 3
North Stand goals: Ist half 1 / 2nd half 15
The latter stats are not as remarkable as they first look - I THINK we've only kicked towards the North in the 1st half THREE times all season (Burnley, Doncaster, Millwall), although I can't remember anything at all about the 0-0 draw with M'boro, so maybe that one too.
So clearly the way to f*ck with us is to just win the toss and force us to play N-S rather than our preferred S-N. Who'd have thought it was so simple?
Not sure what the "obvious reasons" are? Are the East stand unable to sing? Do they not know the words to "Seeaaaaggullllls"?
*Yes, did go to Withdean, but will admit that Goldstone pre-dates me.
So clearly the way to f*ck with us is to just win the toss and force us to play N-S rather than our preferred S-N. Who'd have thought it was so simple?