New Kit

[Wozza]

Imagine in the shorts are the same colour as the sleeves.... END OF DAYS.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Like!
View attachment 85329

That is one hugely acceptable top.

 

[wadhurstseagull]

Is it 100% certain that there's no iron-on sponsor? Hard to tell from the photo.

I'm not convinced that it's not iron on. Looks to have iron on crinkle under left arm in the photos.

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

Is it 100% certain that there's no iron-on sponsor? Hard to tell from the photo.

Not convinced myself.

 

[RexCathedra]

Does sponsor (AMEX) get to dictate which blue (which Pantone number, IIRC Pantone 307..) gets used?
Corporate goes nuts over consistency on things like that.

 

[Pump3ster]

Warning...PERSONAL OPINION...Warning

As a fan not old enough to have seen the widest range of shirts but this is my FAVOURITE shirt.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

View attachment 85334

Like

I spent more time looking at the hotty.

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

Not sure about the lighter blue on the arms. But doesn't look like an ironed on sponsor logo, trying to upload it now.

not bad, looks like the blue on the shoulders and back differs from that on the stripes at the front :/

This is the one that was 'leaked' a while ago on here I think.
The different shade of blue on sleeves / shoulder still ruin it for me.
Maybe the shorts and socks will rescue it...and FKWs will rejoice.

Vile, presumably Nike werent willing to offer us a better colour on the shoulders. It'd be good otherwise

So it is just the Nike Striped Segment III jersey template. Great....Why can't we get a manufacturer who can make a proper bespoke kit instead of one that everyone has? Also WTF is going on with the different shades of blue and the bizarre solid back again?
Nike truly are shit.

I think the shade of blue is the same on the arms, it's just that it's diluted and therefore appears lighter than the blue elsewhere to to fine white pinstripes.

Looks like 2 shirts sewn together

I agree, but I will buy the shirt as I haven't bought one for a few seasons and didn't last year due to the sponsorship sticker.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Does sponsor (AMEX) get to dictate which blue (which Pantone number, IIRC Pantone 307..) gets used?
Corporate goes nuts over consistency on things like that.

As a web dev I have had to put up with those aholes for years, and yes they are very concise.

 

[Bry Nylon]

Looks like 2 shirts sewn together

It's a stitch up!

 

[Is it PotG?]

Not a patch on the old one.

 

[Scotchegg]

I've put it up unlisted, but I dunno how long it will stay up, but here's the clip with the shirt unveiling:

 

[A mex eyecan]

That is one hugely acceptable top.

not too sure Bout Knockies though, but the other top is just wonderful
now for a quick cold shower

 

[Bry Nylon]

Does sponsor (AMEX) get to dictate which blue (which Pantone number, IIRC Pantone 307..) gets used?
Corporate goes nuts over consistency on things like that.

As a web dev I have had to put up with those aholes for years, and yes they are very concise.

Possibly aholes because their web developers use words like "concise" when in fact the mean "precise."

 

[Bry Nylon]

Not a patch on the old one.

Not a patch on the new one, either. Apparently

 

[Sussex Nomad]

I've put it up unlisted, but I dunno how long it will stay up, but here's the clip with the shirt unveiling:

Still blubbing like a fat little kid!

 

[Sussex Nomad]

not too sure Bout Knockies though, but the other top is just wonderful
now for a quick cold shower

I know what you mean!

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Possibly aholes because their web developers use words like "concise" when in fact the mean "precise."

You have to love a pedant. Especially today.

 

[RM-Taylor]

I don't like it

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Possibly aholes because their web developers use words like "concise" when in fact the mean "precise."

FYI, I just googled concise, you sorry little man: giving a lot of information clearly and in a few words; brief but comprehensive. I was not incorrect.