- Thread starter
- #81
Not keen on the panel on the back, but is there a better way to make the number clearer? I doubt it?
A white panel would have been FINE.
Not keen on the panel on the back, but is there a better way to make the number clearer? I doubt it?
Prefer this season’s personally
Struggling to establish whether that is brilliant or horrific.
I wonder if a white oval shape with black numerals would look ok?A white panel would have been FINE.
"Hello Nike - it's Liverpool FC here. We'd like a plain red shirt for next season please."
"Certainly - with contrasting peach trim and pink zig-zags too I should imagine!"
"Err, no - just a plain red shirt please."
"No problem - leave it with us!"
3 months later....
"FFS!"
Not keen on the panel on the back, but is there a better way to make the number clearer? I doubt it?
Otherwise it looks like two seasons ago to me which is fair enough.
I wonder if a white oval shape with black numerals would look ok?
Shame about the club’s owner(s).
They wont do it but....
Remember the Bukta late 70s kit? The players wore a small white patch with a red number, but if the fans bought the shirt it was just normal stripes top to bottom. I reckon they would do better on sales if they went back to that idea, if you want an 'exact' replica you can buy the shirt with the panel ironed on for an extra £xx. After all, they already do it with names, numbers and sleeve patches.
Shame about the club’s owner(s).
The sort of simple, classic, designs that Adidas are known for. Why do so many clubs have to add too much to their kits and confuse everything?
Adidas make some great kits, Nike are just shit, should have stayed in the US and stuck to track and field
We have made some bizarre choices when it comes to our kit manufacturers over the years, wasn't there even a spell back in the late 80's or early 90's, when we designed and even manufactured, our own?