Load of nonsense. The existing laws and cards are sufficient. The only issue is their woeful application. They should concentrate their efforts on this.
I’d like to think this sort of idea is part of improving the application of the laws. If players gradually become better behaved this will happen. Remember the horrendous tackles we used to see back in the 60s, 70s, 80s? That’s largely been eliminated through new sanctions available to the ref. Let’s hope this happens with dissent and cynical fouls.Load of nonsense. The existing laws and cards are sufficient. The only issue is their woeful application. They should concentrate their efforts on this.
Dont worry it will only be 2 minutes. The other 8 will be head injuries, cramp, keeper taking goal kicks etc etcSomething else to take the joy out of the game.....10 minutes of attack against defence training as teams go to a low block until the time is up.
Not to send people off (unless it is the second)Ridiculous.
Whats the yellow card for then??
No idea, but that would be a great excuse to pretend it’s yellow and not leave the fieldOff the top of my head, would that cause issues for people with colour blindness?
Very much this. We seem intent on spoiling the game further by again finding the rubbish cure for no actual known disease. The rules were fine but it's simply the standard of officiating that has hit rock bottom.Just what we need, another stupid rule change. If they want to improve the game just scrap VAR.
From what I'm reading, a yellow + a blue is still a red. So in the situation where a player already is on a yellow, where the ref might be reticent to issue a second yellow, a blue would effectively be exactly the same.Not to send people off (unless it is the second)
I think the blue cards could work well if applied in clear and limited circumstances. They are already used in grassroots football. Refs can be very reticent to issue second yellow cards and even more reticent to issue a red, even when it is deserved - A blue gives a soft option for sending off and will be a good deterrent against professional fouls and time dissent - a useful disciplinary tool when players not yet on a yellow card flout the rules to disrupt a clear scoring opportunity, knowing the benefits are more than the punishment. Frankly the level of dissent by players at nearly every booking is making the game ungovernable at times too and eats up important minutes as well as being intimidating for the ref.
Can see refs getting all fingers and thumbs though trying to pull the right colour card out of his shorts - another pocket maybe - or yellow in left, blue in right, red in back, pen and match card in top shirt pocket -
Most of those examples already exist though.The biggest problem in soccer is not officiating but play-acting and ill-discipline. Fair, balanced officiating is almost impossible because players contest everything, even the most obvious throw-in decision. The slightest contact sees a player writhing around on the ground like a wounded animal. This new proposal, along with this season's yellow cards for dissent and not moving 10 yards for a free kick, are all aimed at curbing the terrible behaviour of players. Whether these measures work, we'll have to see but there’s no doubt whatever that officiating would be much less controversial and better if players stopped their trantrums and just got on with the game.
Given this punishment is somewhere between yellow and red, why isn't it an ORANGE card?
I like your devious tactical thinking, but I would hate to see it.If there’s 8 minutes added time left, and you’re 2 goals up, just get your entire team sin binned with blue cards. The oppo would be able to walk one goal into the open net, but then theres no-one to take the kick off so the game ends and you win by one. Brilliant.