worthingseagull123
Well-known member
- May 5, 2012
- 2,688
Our support isn't as passionate as other clubs unfortunately. Give it a few generations though
Ha!
Isn't every single point in ANs column today been made by someone on NSC recently, even the Palace have the noisiest atmos zinger. (Best away fans, poor atmos in Amex, poor turn out for evening games, crowd as "12th man").
You are kidding Muff and Staines probably but the others, especially Swansea are loud. Plus they know all the words to their own anthem!
Only if you wave your CLACKERS at the same time.
Not just today's column, but ever, I think.
No, not kidding. They were quiet when I went there.
North Stand Goldstone took 6,000, and that was 80/90's, probably more in ancient times.
I'm happy to defend vocally AN and the other journalists who regularly cover the Albion.. I think the criticism he gets on here is ridiculous. Its certainly not poorly researched, dull or trite.
The Argus pays for impressive Albion photography, reporting, journalism, it occasionally holds the club to account (pricing, player recruitment, performances), and provides 2-4 pages of Albion coverage in print,most of it for free online and on Twitter nearly 7 days a week. Of course AN sometimes gets things wrong and he's sometimes tetchy about NSC (who can blame him after comments like the above) but he often holds up his hands to that and is remarkably patient on Twitter especially with some of the reaction he gets.
At the moment the owners of the Albion are relatively benign but that might not always be the case in which case paid journalism with the motivation and resources to scrutinise our club is something worth supporting everywhere.
Do you just want local media to be purely the match reports and coverage provided via the staff who write for seagulls.co.uk ?
I make comments like the above because of how I perceive his coverage which I consider to be poorly researched, dull and trite. You don't, it's a free world and so there we go.
The Argus hasn't exactly been local since its acquisition by Newsquest and AN definitely isn't local himself. I consider him a very lucky individual without much talent who comes across as high and mighty yet rarely has the scoop or skinny and when he does its invariably come from snooping around on here which sometimes comes to bite him on the arse. (Hence his disdain of the place.)
Holding a club to account is the least I would expect of any local rag but there again is the dichotomy because they only do it to boost circulation figures.
Personally I really think local media is about as useful in the modern era as a chocolate tea pot and as such I choose to not read or listen to anything he says. Again that's only my opinion.
Not just today's column, but ever, I think.
The juxtaposition of the TV gantry / cameras and the no-mans-land in the South is particularly unfortunate. Even an almost sell out will provide ample TV coverage of massive empty part of the South and SE.
Why do you think Andy Naylor is not local? Where do you think he came from?
must be annoying for the club that they have provided 500 ,000 quids worth of seating that no-one is allowed to use
That's a little unfair. Just as you may not hear the WSU from the North Stand, you need to realise that not much is heard from the North Stand when in WSU !
why not cover this area with a large flag or fill the seats with manequins.............must be annoying for the club that they have provided 500 ,000 quids worth of seating that no-one is allowed to use , why not have a grassed are with some farm animals or perhaps a small steam engine on a track for the kids to ride at half time...
By virtue of the fact that he supports Stoke City erm Stoke. No one would make a free choice to actively support them from distance?!
Clearly he may have been born locally but by his own admission he supports Stoke, and therefore is not an Albion fan. This has always irrationally annoyed me because then he's just doing a job rather than living it like we do.
By virtue of the fact that he supports Stoke City erm Stoke. No one would make a free choice to actively support them from distance?!
Clearly he may have been born locally but by his own admission he supports Stoke, and therefore is not an Albion fan. This has always irrationally annoyed me because then he's just doing a job rather than living it like we do.
He chose Stoke because of Gordon Banks.
Some Albion fans prefer a neutral journalist to a biased one who may be a club apologist.
I've sampled the relative comforts of the media facilities in the Premier League and the Championship and, believe me, it's very much in Andy Naylor's interests for us to be promoted. No-one in their right mind would want to go to Birmingham City, Brentford or Reading when they could be enjoying the lavish hospitality at Arsenal, Chelsea or Man City.
By virtue of the fact that he supports Stoke City erm Stoke. No one would make a free choice to actively support them from distance?!
Clearly he may have been born locally but by his own admission he supports Stoke, and therefore is not an Albion fan. This has always irrationally annoyed me because then he's just doing a job rather than living it like we do.