Tooting Gull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 11,033
I have often defended Naylor, because in the past I think some of the criticisms of his journalistic abilities have been based on ignorance, and that he's a lot better than you'd find on other local papers.
But I'm struggling with all this 'opinion' stuff. This case in point is just shit-stirring, plain and simple. If there is an issue/conflict between Attila's comments and his role, it's one for him and the club to resolve one way or the other, it doesn't merit a piece in the paper.
When did these opinion columns start? Strikes me it was about a year ago, must have been some conscious decision within the paper or sports desk. It isn't working, or being done right. Rather than stirring up meaningful debate, it's just looking like a series of petty vendettas being aired in public.
But I'm struggling with all this 'opinion' stuff. This case in point is just shit-stirring, plain and simple. If there is an issue/conflict between Attila's comments and his role, it's one for him and the club to resolve one way or the other, it doesn't merit a piece in the paper.
When did these opinion columns start? Strikes me it was about a year ago, must have been some conscious decision within the paper or sports desk. It isn't working, or being done right. Rather than stirring up meaningful debate, it's just looking like a series of petty vendettas being aired in public.