Eksman
Active member
Pretty much - Not all the money, but the vast majority came from Tony. OK?
The Goldstone - before his time.
he's a JCL
Pretty much - Not all the money, but the vast majority came from Tony. OK?
The Goldstone - before his time.
As at 30 June 2012, TB owned 77% and had lent the club £120m. Since then he has converted £40m of the loan into shares (giving him 91% ownership) and still has £80m of the loan outstanding at 30 June 2012. The loan amount will have increased since then, since TB committed in the June 2012 accounts to fund the losses for at least the next 13 months (which you have to do in order to get a clean audit report). It wouldn't surprise me if more of the loan gets converted to equity. TB has total control of the club.
Why didn't he step in while we at the Goldstone? No idea, but it wouldn't surprise me if the answer is simply that he didn't have the money back then. It's the simplest and most likely reason, unless one is trying to push an agenda....
Wasn't it also the case that if Archer had got a sniff of TB being in the wings then he would have made it harder for the board to get shot of him, hence he was the silent benefactor for some time.
pretty much what exactly does that mean
and a question I have asked on here before why was it he did not step in while the Goldstone was still in the hands of the club?
I've heard the same thing, but I don't know that to be the case.
He was still at school.
I think there's something on it in "We want Falmer". Can't be certain.
I do seem to remember in the seasons following Dick Knight's takeover, people were genuinely surprised to discover that Archer was still a shareholder. Not sure which year he finally relinquished his shares.
I think he left Lancing in '88...
I think there's something on it in "We want Falmer". Can't be certain.
I do seem to remember in the seasons following Dick Knight's takeover, people were genuinely surprised to discover that Archer was still a shareholder. Not sure which year he finally relinquished his shares.
Andy Naylor has never understood the Albion. Just a few points:-
1. "New fans". As he only turned up at the Albion after/during the War Years wioth Archer, he cant recall 30000 crowds at the goldstone. The Amex will onthe whole be children, grandchildren and great grandchildren of those people.
2. "They will drift away". BHA get big crowds in the lower leagues. Always have. He has no evidence for this and therefore its an odd assertion.
3. "Is the aim promotion". Yes we are just off the play offs with a major injury crisis.
My question for Andy Naylor is twofold:-
1. When will he learn some history about this football club and
2. Why does he think its ok to demand to spend more of Tony Bloom's money.
My question for the argus is:-
1. When will you employ someone like John Vinecombe who actually understands the Albion?
Naylor has been around Brighton for a long time as he went to school here
Andy Naylor has never understood the Albion. Just a few points:-
1. "New fans". As he only turned up at the Albion after/during the War Years wioth Archer, he cant recall 30000 crowds at the goldstone. The Amex will onthe whole be children, grandchildren and great grandchildren of those people.
2. "They will drift away". BHA get big crowds in the lower leagues. Always have. He has no evidence for this and therefore its an odd assertion.
3. "Is the aim promotion". Yes we are just off the play offs with a major injury crisis.
My question for Andy Naylor is twofold:-
1. When will he learn some history about this football club and
2. Why does he think its ok to demand to spend more of Tony Bloom's money.
My question for the argus is:-
1. When will you employ someone like John Vinecombe who actually understands the Albion?
My comment was tongue in cheek. He hadn't made his own fortune in 97 as he was only 27 at the time although his family had money.
Where has he demanded that Bloom spend more money
Where has he demanded that Bloom spend more money
You know and I know that is the implied criticism. Naylor should be replaced by a team of different writers, all of whom with different perspectives and hopefully some knowledge of the Albion. I dont even read the argus online anymore. The only reason I did was for the Albion but I find NSC can be a better read if you sift through the wind ups ect. I think the Argus could cover the Albion (their biggest seller of papers and hits on their website) in a much better way. They just need to think about it.