So . . . . our recent debacle, now possibly over . . . it was all HIS fault, then. Possibly.
So . . . . our recent debacle, now possibly over . . . it was all HIS fault, then. Possibly.
Needs at least half a dozen games to have any impact.
Like he had for us
2 games ? Who was the other one against ?So . . . . our recent debacle, now possibly over . . . it was all HIS fault, then. Possibly. [emoji38]ol:
So . . . . our recent debacle, now possibly over . . . it was all HIS fault, then. Possibly.
Hadn't he left when we lost to Rotherham, our worst performance of the season?
Pedant
So . . . . our recent debacle, now possibly over . . . it was all HIS fault, then. Possibly.
Luron is that in Portugal or somewhere
Like he had for us
You have to remember............Luton sacked their manager. They didn't sack him for no reason, so Nathan has probably inherited a squad not good enough for the division they are in. You only need to think back to what CH inherited at Brighton.
You always learn from every manager you work under - What he has probably learned from Chris is that you try and steady the ship defensively until you ensure you don't get relegated and then you build your own team after that.
Nathan will do well if he gets the time to do it - He is extremely enthusiastic and driven young manager. The problem he has got is that if he fails at Luton he may not be given the opportunity again. Much like Chris at Newcastle. If he had failed there he probably wouldn't have got another job as manager at that level again. Luckily he succeeded up there