colonies man
New member
- Jul 30, 2011
- 488
Interesting that at Stoke there is some unrest at Nathan's selections/tactics.
Interesting that at Stoke there is some unrest at Nathan's selections/tactics.
Yes.Being found out as not being as good as many suggest.
Should've stayed with Luton. Baffling decision to move.
Interesting that at Stoke there is some unrest at Nathan's selections/tactics.
Well when it is a squad game and the club is not winning regularly this will always happen. There is no right team selection. People go on about CH and who he selects but when they choose their team there are so many different selections. He has got his hands full there, a club with a lot of premier league history and a shortage of funds. I expect him to last until November at the latest.
I've seen enough over 2 seasons to see that he has reached his limit with us. We need new energy. I wouldn't trust him with my money for team building.Get a full pre season in and have a clear out/new signings in, then judge him.
With Opta stats like "Since Nathan Jones' first game in charge of Stoke City on January 12th, the club have scored the fewest goals (11), attempted the fewest shots (146) and attempted the fewest shots on target (36) in the Championship"
With Opta stats like "Since Nathan Jones' first game in charge of Stoke City on January 12th, the club have scored the fewest goals (11), attempted the fewest shots (146) and attempted the fewest shots on target (36) in the Championship" I'm nit surprised, especially as there was a lot of naysayers in the first place - they were always going to air their views.
I've seen enough over 2 seasons to see that he has reached his limit with us. We need new energy. I wouldn't trust him with my money for team building.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
With Opta stats like "Since Nathan Jones' first game in charge of Stoke City on January 12th, the club have scored the fewest goals (11), attempted the fewest shots (146) and attempted the fewest shots on target (36) in the Championship" I'm nit surprised, especially as there was a lot of naysayers in the first place - they were always going to air their views.
I think Nathan Jones is better than Stoke , he inherited the squad & that squad has shown its not good enough. At Luton he built the squad over a couple of seasons & its still performing under their new man. Nathan might suit us if we are relegated and CH gets the boot but I dont see him as good enough to manage in the prem yet.