ewe2
Well-known member
Murray is carrying an injury,and not fit .......Hemed is playing really well !!....I cant see a problem,when we only use one striker and Brown is fit again,for that role as well.
Back after the Leicester game, there were rumours [Glenn] would be out for 6 weeks - 3 months. This was denied of course (mostly by a certain poster on here).
I believe at least one of the times such accusations were levelled at him he was carrying a hernia injury of some sort (thinking Leeds in league 1 when he gave up a chase back leaving them clean through for a goal).
Back after the Leicester game, there were rumours he would be out for 6 weeks - 3 months. This was denied of course (mostly by a certain poster on here). It was mooted in that thread that perhaps the club were downplaying his injury given our inability to sign strikers in the window, and the general mood of fans after the window slammed shut. He returned to the squad, but a generally less inspiring Hemed got the nod ahead of him. When Murray came on toward the end of the game, we saw the Murray that played against Leeds that time.
I'd find it much more believable that Murray is simply more injured than the club let on. He's tried to play through it, using his experience to compensate, but only hasn't really managed it. Wasn't in the squad for the cup game we didn't care about, and with Izzy Brown back, he wasn't on the bench today.
We're on week 5. I'm going to believe he just needs more time to recover to get back to full fitness (and then will probably need a couple of matches to regain match fitness). Hopefully the 6 weeks was closer to the truth than the 3 months, and hopefully, we won't need to rush him back because the FA decided to act on a stamp that may or may not have been deliberate.
199 posts in eight days - congratulations
He was at the game because I saw a tweet from someone who saw him driving into the car park an hour before kick off.
This seems to be a thread of bullshit speculation that you "heard from a mate"
Thanks! [emoji6]Happy Birthday Glen....
Great post!Bang on.
I just don't get the criticism of Murray. I absolutely love the man and always clapped him off when he came back here even when he had scored against us (never celebrating).
Last season he was brilliantly level headed (remember him slapping down an over exuberant Knocky?). I have seen him on the box and he is an unassuming, thoughtful man with absolutely no side to him. He is also the picture of health (really looks after himself). Cool calm and collected (easily mistaken for lacking passion - wrong!).
I hope he can recover from his injury and get back in contention soon.
The way we are setting up to play this season will not suit him (I'm surprised it's suited Hemed TBH). If Hemed is out, it'll be Brown upfront, or at least until Baldock is back. In that case it'll be Brown...
I think Murray plays better in a 2, as he can set up or receive knockdowns.Really ? Hughton dropped Hemed for Leicester and Murray was the first choice lone striker in a 4-4-1-1.
Arguably GM would have been first pick striker v Man City as well if he hadn't missed Athletico Madrid due to the 1 match suspension.
And since then he's been shaking off an injury and Hemed is now in form so obviously likely to keep his place (unless suspended).
And Brown's only appearance this season was in preference to Knockaert .
I think Murray plays better in a 2, as he can set up or receive knockdowns.
Playing one up front for me only works with a quicker player, getting through balls and trying to outrun defenders. We know that's not Murray's game.
Up until yesterday we had little choice about who to play upfront, but all credit to Hemed for playing well. I was one of his doubters.
It was denied mostly... by him. And he's played since then.
the made up speculative guff on here.
He's fallen out with Hughton, he's not motivated to get fit, he didn't go to the game, he's pissed off he's on the bench, the club aren't letting on how fit he is.
or . he's just not 100% fit , he's recovering