Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Murray's penalty appeal
- Thread starter TheDuke
- Start date
More of a question was the dunk handball a penalty ?
- Thread starter
- #3
just answer the question Moggy
The Albion Roar
97.2FM
As I thought I was at the time, and the Grauniad report mentioned, their player lifted Dunk's arm up to knock him into the ball.
Seeing as their player pushed Dunks hand right onto the ball, no. Cheating imo.
- Thread starter
- #7
Is dangerous play inside the penalty area just an indirect free kick?
Well there's been a few penalties lately where the defender has raised his foot and caught the attacker, seeing it in realtime I thought penalty, through blue tinted glasses of course. But what about baldocks yellow card, haven't seen any replays of it but at the time I thought it was cast iron penalty, anyone seen anything of this?
My stream was patchy to say the least but I thought the defender caught him and it looked a pen to me
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Yes I'm pretty sure it is. As its def indirect if upside the area. Had a quick Google and its hidden in certain articles - at the bottom here below - but nothing 100%. Think I'm right though - someone will confirm:
http://sports.stackexchange.com/questions/2525/which-offences-result-in-indirect-free-kicks
Again, if he actually catches the striker it may be deemed a standard foul - isn't dangerous play if the intent is there but no contact? I'm rusty on the finer rules these days.
Richy_Seagull
Well-known member
Arsenal v Burnley same thing and penalty was given.
Pen for me - dangerous play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pen for me - dangerous play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- #12
If you look at where Muzza is pointing to his forehead... defo marks from the kick
Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
Any seen the Baldock "dive" again looked like a trip to me
Even though it should've been offside.
changed a few years ago no such thing as dangerous play now its just a foul so direct freekick anywhere on the pitch. Indirect is now only for infringement of the rules such as offside. Obstruction is now a straight foul where before it was indirect.
Oh and he was kicked twice in the head in the area, within minutes.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Thanks - and yes Murray certainly was kicked in the head twice for sure - one of them the ref ignores because he got his header away... Not doubting your words but definately saw a ref in a game recently signal an indirect free kick for something on the edge of the area that I think was for dangerous play / foot up - it may well have been at the Amex in fact. May have been on TV can't remember!
It's dangerous play only if no contact is made. If there's contact then it's a penalty, surely?
Guy Fawkes
The voice of treason
- Sep 29, 2007
- 8,295
Never a penalty, he did handball it, but only after he was fouled and barged by the defender, causing the handball which wouldn't have otherwise happened
Baldock should have had an early penalty too but was inexplicably booked instead which it was clear to us present that he was fouled and had not dived + the Murray incident where he was kicked in the head in the box (no foul and the ref didn't even want to stop for the head injury and played on for quite a while) only for the ref to award a free kick against us for a high boot which was only waist high shortly afterwards
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,319
Yeh I think you're right however it seems there's now no such thing.
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/foo.../92/44/laws.of.the.game.2016.2017_neutral.pdf
See page 82
ps. I hope you're not a ref!!!!
Last edited: