Honestly, genuine question (and yes i have been to a lot of games this season), just HOW good is Glenn Murray? I'm not doubting he is a talented player but at the same time I feel he has been spoilt rotten this season with the service from Benno etc so much so that even Barnes (not knocking him at all!) in his first full season as a pro has bagged TWENTY goals. Murray is a good player but I think it would be fair to say he has been helped to look so good because of the way we play and that is not something he will get at Palace or most other clubs in fact who play hoofball or whatever.
Losing him would be a loss yes, but if we could replace him with i don't know, for example Lambert then we would be fine while Murray gets berated by fans of some other club for his languid style and not scoring like he did for us.
He's scored a lot of tap-ins, and has missed a lot of headers that he probably should have done better with. The service has been outstanding.
However, he's always been the sort of player to score 'easy' goals. What we've seen this year (Tranmere at home and away, Plymouth (?) at home) is that he can score a more spectacular one if he wants to as well. Dont forget how many pens/free kicks he's won us as well. We've seen him win almost every header ever in both boxes and part of the reason why I think people have been so quick to get on Chris Wood's back is because he is so easily comparable to Glenn who I cant remember having a bad game all season, even in the games he didnt score.
He's my favourite player, I'd hate it and I'd hate him if he went to Palace. Just mildly miffed for the time being though. All this talk about swapping Lambert and Murray kind of makes sense in footballing terms, would be annoying financially though. Cant really see that one happening though.