Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Murdoch controls the country?







strings

Moving further North...
Feb 19, 2006
9,969
Barnsley
Whilst I agree that the punishment was disproportionate to the crime, it did cause a Select Committee meeting to be disrupted. If you form-pied somebody in the street, that wouldn't have happened.
 




Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
done in a palace tho but still hardly throwing away the key - three weeks in clink for assault seems quite good

However it is tried, it is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.

Relevant cases are:

R v. Nottingham Crown Court ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] 1 Cr.App.R. (S.) 283
R v. Dunn [2003] 2 Cr.App.R. (S.) 90
[edit] Racially or religiously aggravated offenceIn England and Wales, section 29(1)(c) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (c.37) creates the distinct offence of racially or religiously aggravated common assault.

[edit] Status of offenceThis is the least serious assault and, under section 11 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, a common assault can be an alternative verdict to more serious offences of assault. In real terms, the degree of fear or the level of injury required for a conviction can be slight. No injury is required to prove battery.


May-Bowles was ordered to serve three weeks in prison and pay a £15 victim surcharge and £250 costs.
 


Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
Good, it was a planned pre mediated attack. Deserves what he gets no matter who it was done to
 




cjd

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2006
6,352
La Rochelle
3 weeks....??? Nowhere near long enough.

He assaulted an 80 year old man for nothing more than a publicity stunt. Three years would have been more appropriate.
 


Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
I'd have given him longer TBH - it was a pre-meditated attack, in part I'm sure just for the publicity - he didn't seem to have an actual point to make. Regardless that it was Murdoch - he's still an 80 year old man. The bloke was a twonk so deserved all he gets.
 






Husty

Mooderator
Oct 18, 2008
11,998
3 weeks....??? Nowhere near long enough.

He assaulted an 80 year old man for nothing more than a publicity stunt. Three years would have been more appropriate.

"Assaulted"? It was shaving foam.
 


bhaexpress

New member
Jul 7, 2003
27,627
Kent
Basically this bloke's attack was more of a publicity stunt. Not a fan of Murdoch but he deserves his punishment. The courts have to come down hard on this sort of act as a warning to others who seek to disrupt Parliament. In Guy Fawkes' time he'd have been hung drawn and quartered.
 


element

Fear [is] the key.....
Jan 28, 2009
1,887
Local
Didn't the bloke have a hoity toity double barrelled name? Champagne Socialist I should imagine ???
 




Jul 30, 2011
34
London
The video in slow motion is rather funny!
 


SeagullRic

New member
Jan 13, 2008
1,399
brighton
3 weeks....??? Nowhere near long enough.

He assaulted an 80 year old man for nothing more than a publicity stunt. Three years would have been more appropriate.

Three years for throwing a plate of shaving foam? Please tell me you're joking!
 
















BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
19,077
I love this board. There was a thread a while ago suggesting it was okay to kill a burglar, but 3 weeks imprisonment for putting shaving foam on one of the most despicable characters of modern times is seen as getting off lightly.:lolol::lolol:
 


Silent Bob

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Dec 6, 2004
22,172
I love this board. There was a thread a while ago suggesting it was okay to kill a burglar, but 3 weeks imprisonment for putting shaving foam on one of the most despicable characters of modern times is seen as getting off lightly.:lolol::lolol:
Those are positions entirely consistent with each other.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here