Hornblower
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 1,712
Very disappointing. Too long, Spall's performance cliched and affected, very little plot. On the plus side, wonderful costumes, settings and cinematography but I'm afraid the cons outweighed the pros.
Very disappointing. Too long, Spall's performance cliched and affected, very little plot. On the plus side, wonderful costumes, settings and cinematography but I'm afraid the cons outweighed the pros.
Seeing Interstellar tonight
Very disappointing. Too long, Spall's performance cliched and affected, very little plot. On the plus side, wonderful costumes, settings and cinematography but I'm afraid the cons outweighed the pros.
Very disappointing. Too long, Spall's performance cliched and affected, very little plot. On the plus side, wonderful costumes, settings and cinematography but I'm afraid the cons outweighed the pros.
I was going to (partly) say the opposite.
Spall was very good - he has a range of talents which he can call on at any moment. He set the character early on, and stuck with it - and it worked. I am biased, though, as I am a big fan of Timothy Spall.
That said, it was too long and a bit laboured. You also need to know about Turner in order to get the references. It was very much a Mike Leigh film, and while I am a fan of much of his work - including this instance the costumes, settings and cinematography - he really ought to leave biopics alone.
I'm more looking forward to The Imitation Game, out next Friday.
9 and1/2 hours of watching Timothy Spall gurning through a load of middle class guff. You have been warned.
Cruel but fair.