Most users ever online was 399 on 27-07-2004 at 04:18 .

[DC Rules]

Can anyone explain to me why there were so many people online then?

 

[Beach Hut]

Something to do with Falmer no doubt, another false dawn or a horrendous LDC announcement

 

[DC Rules]

don't people ever sleep though?

 

[Beach Hut]

don't people ever sleep though?

Think that would be in the afternoon

 

[Captain Pugwash]

was it aids in a internet cafe with all his differnet usernames logged on at the same time

 

[DC Rules]

Think that would be in the afternoon

surely then it would be "at 16.18"?

 

[DC Rules]

was it aids in a internet cafe with all his differnet usernames logged on at the same time

that could be it

 

[Beach Hut]

surely then it would be "at 16.18"?

Not on the NSC clock, it tends to lose track of time

 

[Springal]

could be bots

 

[sams dad]

could be bots

What is/are "bots"?

 

[nail-Z]

The times on the older threads are wrong as the database moved to a server in a different time zone. I think you need to add about 7 hours to all times prior to the move.

 

[Lord Bracknell]

It was a thread that I started (at about 9.00am as I recall).



This one

 

[Leekbrookgull]

nsc,BUZZS. my kids love it. AND post.

 

[only1robbiereinalt]

'By re-opening the Public Inquiry, Prescott is guaranteeing that he can’t be challenged on the “alternative site” issue. He can give a final YES by the autumn – and the NIMBYs won’t be able to challenge it.

If he said YES today, Falmer Parish Council (and possibly Lewes District Council as well) would certainly challenge it. We’d be hanging on for a year before we could make any further progress.'

 

[Lord Bracknell]

'By re-opening the Public Inquiry, Prescott is guaranteeing that he can’t be challenged on the “alternative site” issue. He can give a final YES by the autumn – and the NIMBYs won’t be able to challenge it.

If he said YES today, Falmer Parish Council (and possibly Lewes District Council as well) would certainly challenge it. We’d be hanging on for a year before we could make any further progress.'

I stand by that.

What we NEVER anticipated was that the ODPM civil servants would cock up the decision letter with a stupid technical error and open the door to a legal challenge that the 2004 decision was intended to make impossible.